Abstract
Despite the desirable information contained in complex pedigree datasets, analysis methods struggle to efficiently process these datasets. The attractiveness of pedigree data sets is their power for detecting rare variants, particularly in comparison with studies of unrelated individuals. In addition, rather than assuming individuals in a study are unrelated, knowledge of their relationships can avoid spurious results due to confounding population structure effects. However, a major challenge for the applicability of pedigree methods is the ability handle complex pedigrees, having multiple founding lineages, inbreeding, and half-sibling relationships.
A key ingredient in association studies is imputation and inference of haplotypes from genotype data. Existing haplotype inference methods either do not efficiently scales to complex pedigrees or their accuracy is limited. In this paper, we present algorithms for efficient haplotype inference and imputation in complex pedigrees. Our method, PhyloPed, leverages the perfect phylogeny model, resulting in an efficient method with high accuracy. In addition, PhyloPed effectively combines the founder haplotype information from different lineages and is immune to inaccuracies in prior information about the founders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abney, M., Ober, C., McPeek, M.S.: Quantitative-trait homozygosity and association mapping and empirical genomewide significance in large, complex pedigrees: Fasting serum-insulin level in the hutterites. The American Journal of Human Genetics 70(4), 920–934 (2002)
Barrett, J.C., Hansoul, S., Nicolae, D.L., Cho, J.H., Duerr, R.H., Rioux, J.D., Brant, S.R., Silverberg, M.S., Taylor, K.D., Barmada, M.M., et al.: Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for crohn’s disease. Nature Genetics 40, 955–962 (2008)
Burdick, J.T., Chen, W., Abecasis, G.R., Cheung, V.G.: In silico method for inferring genotyeps in pedigrees. Nature Genetics 38, 1002–1004 (2006)
Cannings, C., Sheehan, N.A.: On a Misconception About Irreducibility of the Single-Site Gibbs Sampler in a Pedigree Application. Genetics 162(2), 993–996 (2002)
Chen, W.-M., Abecasis, G.R.: Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 913–926 (2007)
Daly, M.J., Rioux, J.D., Schaffner, S.F., Hudson, T.J., Lander, E.S.: High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nature Genetics 29(2), 229–232 (2001)
Ding, Z., Filkov, V., Gusfield, D.: A linear-time algorithm for perfect phylogeny haplotyping. Journal of Computational Biology 2, 522–553 (2006)
Elston, R.C., Stewart, J.: A general model for the analysis of pedigree data. Human Heredity 21, 523–542 (1971)
Eskin, E., Halperin, E., Karp, R.: Efficient reconstruction of haplotype structure via perfect phylogeny. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 1(1), 1–20 (2003)
Fishelson, M., Dovgolevsky, N., Geiger, D.: Maximum likelihood haplotyping for general pedigrees. Human Heredity 59, 41–60 (2005)
Gusfield. Haplotyping as perfect phylogeny: Conceptual framework and efficient solutions. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on (Research in) Computational (Molecular) Biology (2002)
Halperin, E., Kimmel, G., Shamir, R.: Tag SNP selection in genotype data for maximizing SNP prediction accuracy. Bioinformatics 21(suppl. 1), i195–i203 (2005)
Jensen, C.S., Kong, A.: Blocking gibbs sampling for linkage analysis in large pedigrees with many loops. American Journal of Human Genetics 65 (1999)
Lander, E.S., Green, P.: Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 84(5), 2363–2367 (1987)
Lauritzen, S.L., Sheehan, N.A.: Graphical models for genetic analysis. Statistical Science 18(4), 489–514 (2003)
Piccolboni, A., Gusfield, D.: On the complexity of fundamental computational problems in pedigree analysis. Journal of Computational Biology 10(5), 763–773 (2003)
Sutter, N.B., Bustamante, C.D., Chase, K., Gray, M.M., Zhao, K., Zhu, L., Padhukasahasram, B., Karlins, E., Davis, S., Jones, P.G., Quignon, P., Johnson, G.S., Parker, H.G., Fretwell, N., Mosher, D.S., Lawler, D.F., Satyaraj, E., Nordborg, M., Lark, K.G., Wayne, R.K., Ostrander, E.A.: A Single IGF1 Allele Is a Major Determinant of Small Size in Dogs. Science 316(5821), 112–115 (2007)
Thomas, A., Abkevich, V., Gutin, A., Bansal, A.: Multilocus linkage analysis by blocked gibbs sampling. Statistics and Computing 10(3), 259–269 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kirkpatrick, B., Rosa, J., Halperin, E., Karp, R.M. (2009). Haplotype Inference in Complex Pedigrees. In: Batzoglou, S. (eds) Research in Computational Molecular Biology. RECOMB 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02007-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02008-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)