Skip to main content

Constructing the Spatial Weights Matrix Using a Local Statistic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Spatial weights matrices are necessary elements in most regression models where a representation of spatial structure is needed. We construct a spatial weights matrix, W, based on the principle that spatial structure should be considered in a two-part framework, those units that evoke a distance effect, and those that do not. Our two-variable local statistics model (LSM) is based on the G i * local statistic. The local statistic concept depends on the designation of a critical distance, d c , defined as the distance beyond which no discernible increase in clustering of high or low values exists. In a series of simulation experiments LSM is compared to well-known spatial weights matrix specifications – two different contiguity configurations, three different inverse distance formulations, and three semi-variance models. The simulation experiments are carried out on a random spatial pattern and two types of spatial clustering patterns. The LSM performed best according to the Akaike Information Criterion, a spatial autoregressive coefficient evaluation, and Moran’s I tests on residuals. The flexibility inherent in the LSM allows for its favorable performance when compared to the rigidity of the global models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This point was made to us in correspondence by Michael Tiefelsdorf, the editor of this article.

References

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels CPA (1979) Operational statistical methods for analysing spatial data. In: Bartels CPA, Ketellapper RH (eds) Exploratory and explanatory statistical analysis of spatial data. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett RJ (1979) Spatial time series. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boots BN, Dufournaud C (1994) A programming approach to minimizing and maximizing spatial autocorrelation statistics. Geogr Anal 26:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boots BN, Tiefelsdorf M (2000) Global and local spatial autocorrelation in bounded regular tessellations. J Geogr Syst 2:319–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florax RJGM, Rey SJ (1995) The impacts of misspecified spatial interaction in linear regression models. In: Anselin L, Florax RJGM (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME, Brunsdon C (1996) The geography of parameter space: an investigation of spatial non-stationarity. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 10:605–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A (1995a) Spatial filtering in a regression framework: examples using data on urban crime, regional inequality, and government expenditures. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin, pp 172–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Griffith DA (2002) Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geogr Anal 34:130–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman S (1976) Some remarks on the statistical analysis of grids especially with respect to ecology. Ann Syst Res 5:113–132

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP (2004) A family of geographically weighted regression models. In: Anselin L, Florax R, Rey S (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–264

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen D, McDonald J (2004) Locally weighted maximum likelihood estimation: Monte Carlo evidence and an application. In: Anselin L, Florax R, Rey S (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1977) Optimal zoning systems for spatial interaction models. Environ Plan A 9: 169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefelsdorf M (2000) Modelling spatial processes. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefelsdorf M, Griffith DA, Boots BN (1999) A variance-stabilizing coding scheme for spatial link matrices. Environ Plan A 31:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the comments of Michael Tiefelsdorf and three anonymous reviewers. The paper has been considerably strengthened due to their suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Getis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Getis, A., Aldstadt, J. (2010). Constructing the Spatial Weights Matrix Using a Local Statistic. In: Anselin, L., Rey, S. (eds) Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics