Skip to main content

Capturing Complex Business Processes Interdependencies Using Modeling and Simulation in a Multi-actor Environment

  • Conference paper
Advances in Enterprise Engineering III (CIAO! 2009, EOMAS 2009)

Abstract

Current business processes tend to become increasingly complex as a result of extensive interdependencies with partner organizations and the increasing use of technology for decision making in multi-actor environments. This complexity often grows to the extent that none of the involved actors is able to have a total overview of the complete end-to-end processes. An example of such a complex process is the application process of new merchants to obtain the possibility to accept electronic payments. Although static modeling of such a process can reveal valuable information about the structure and organization of business processes and the relation with the involved actors, a simulation model can provide more insight into behavior of the business system. With this knowledge the possible bottlenecks and problems within this process can be found, and then used to improve the business system resulting in an improved customer satisfaction. This paper describes the set-up of this simulation model and its use for finding efficient policy measures for involved actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baffo, I., Confessore, G., Galiano, G., Rismondo, S.: A multi agent system model to evaluate the dynamics of a collaborative network. In: ICEIS 2008 – Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, AIDDS, pp. 480–483 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carson II, J.S.: Introduction to modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 7–13 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeBenedictis, E., Ghosh, S., Yu, M.-L.: A Novel Algorithm for Discrete-Event Simulation. IEEE Computer 24(6), 21–33 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh, S.: The Role of Modeling and Asynchronous Distributed Simulation in Analyzing Complex Systems of the Future. Information Systems Frontiers 4(2), 161–177 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greasley, A.: Effective Uses of Business Process Simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2004–2009 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Han, K., Kauffman, R.J., Nault, B.R.: Relative importance, specific investment and ownership in interorganizational systems. Information Technology Management 9, 181–200 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen, M.: Adaptability and Accountability of Information Architectures in Interorganizational Networks. In: International Conference on Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2007), Macao, December 10-13, 2007, pp. 57–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kauffman, R.J., Kumar, A.: Network effects and embedded options: decision-making under uncertainty for network technology investments. Information Technology Management 9, 149–168 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., Sadowski, D.A.: Simulation with Arena, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koppenjan, J., Groenewegen, J.: Institutional design for complex technological systems. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 5(3), 240–257 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koppenjan, J.: Creating a playing field for assessing the effectiveness of network collaboration by performance measures. Public Management Review 10(6), 699–714 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mintzberg, H.: Organizational Design, Fashion or Fit? Harvard Business Review 59(1), 103–116 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sage, A.P.: Risk in system of systems engineering and management. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization 4(3), 477–487 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shannon, R.E.: Introduction to the art and science of simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiedemann, T., Kung, W.: Actual and future options of simulation and optimization in manufacturing, organization and logistics. In: Verbraeck, A., Hlupic, V. (eds.) Proceedings 15th European Simulation Symposium, SCS Europe, pp. 627–637 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeigler, B.P., Praehofer, H., Kim, T.G.: Theory of modeling and simulation, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, J.W., Barjis, J., Verbraeck, A., Janssen, M., Kort, J. (2009). Capturing Complex Business Processes Interdependencies Using Modeling and Simulation in a Multi-actor Environment. In: Albani, A., Barjis, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering III. CIAO! EOMAS 2009 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01915-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01915-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01914-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01915-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics