Skip to main content

Vertical Alignment of Process Models – How Can We Get There?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2009, EMMSAD 2009)

Abstract

There is a wide variety of drivers for business process modelling initiatives, reaching from business evolution and process optimisation over compliance checking and process certification to process enactment. That, in turn, results in models that differ in content due to serving different purposes. In particular, processes are modelled on different abstraction levels and assume different perspectives. Vertical alignment of process models aims at handling these deviations. While the advantages of such an alignment for inter-model analysis and change propagation are out of question, a number of challenges has still to be addressed. In this paper, we discuss three main challenges for vertical alignment in detail. Against this background, the potential application of techniques from the field of process integration is critically assessed. Based thereon, we identify specific research questions that guide the design of a framework for model alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ramackers, G.J.: Integrated Object Modelling. PhD thesis, Leiden University, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grover, V., Fiedler, K., Teng, J.: Exploring the Success of Information Technology Enabled Businessprocess Reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41(3), 276–284 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rolland, C., Prakash, N.: Bridging the Gap Between Organisational Needs and ERP Functionality. Requirements Engineering 5(3), 180–193 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J., Johannesson, P.: Service-based processes: Design for business and technology. In: Aiello, M., Aoyama, M., Curbera, F., Papazoglou, M.P. (eds.) ICSOC, pp. 21–29. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Koehler, J., Hauser, R., Küster, J.M., Ryndina, K., Vanhatalo, J., Wahler, M.: The Role of Visual Modeling and Model Transformations in Business-driven Development. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 211, 5–15 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosemann, M.: Preparation of Process Modeling. In: Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, pp. 41–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) 1.1(January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergholtz, M., Jayaweera, P., Johannesson, P., Wohed, P.: A Pattern and Dependency Based Approach to the Design of Process Models. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 724–739. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T., Johannesson, P.: A Declarative Foundation of Process Models. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 233–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Decker, G.: Bridging the Gap between Business Processes and existing IT Functionality. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Design of Service-Oriented Applications (WDSOA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 17–24 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frank, H., Eder, J.: Towards an Automatic Integration of Statecharts. In: Akoka, J., Bouzeghoub, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Métais, E. (eds.) ER 1999. LNCS, vol. 1728, pp. 430–444. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mendling, J., Simon, C.: Business Process Design by View Integration. In: [28], pp. 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  13. Küster, J.M., Koehler, J., Ryndina, K.: Improving Business Process Models with Reference Models in Business-Driven Development. In: [28], pp. 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dijkman, R.M.: A Classification of Differences between Similar Business Processes. In: EDOC, pp. 37–50. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dijkman, R.M.: Diagnosing differences between business process models. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Dijkman, R.M., Quartel, D.A.C., Pires, L.F., van Sinderen, M.: A Rigorous Approach to Relate Enterprise and Computational Viewpoints. In: EDOC, pp. 187–200. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Dongen, B.F., Dijkman, R.M., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsene, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: On Measuring Process Model Similarity based on High-level Change Operations. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 248–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Soffer, P.: Refinement equivalence in model-based reuse: Overcoming differences in abstraction level. J. Database Manag. 16(3), 21–39 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Basten, T., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Inheritance of Behavior. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming (JLAP) 47(2), 47–145 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebert, J., Engels, G.: Observable or Invocable Behaviour - You Have to Choose. Technical Report 94-38, Department of Computer Science, Leiden University (December 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schrefl, M., Stumptner, M.: Behavior-consistent specialization of object life cycles. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 11(1), 92–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weidlich, M., Decker, G., Weske, M., Barros, A.: Towards Vertical Alignment of Process Models - A Collection of Mismatches. Technical report, Hasso Plattner Institute (2008), http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/pub/Public/BptPublications/collection_of_mismatches.pdf

  24. Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise Integration Patterns: Designing, Building, and Deploying Messaging Solutions. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grossmann, G., Schrefl, M., Stumptner, M.: Classification of business process correspondences and associated integration operators. In: Wang, S., Tanaka, K., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W., Guan, J., Yang, D.-q., Grandi, F., Mangina, E.E., Song, I.-Y., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2004. LNCS, vol. 3289, pp. 653–666. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Supporting development and evolution of service-based processes. In: ICEBE, pp. 647–656. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–339 (September 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.): BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weidlich, M., Barros, A., Mendling, J., Weske, M. (2009). Vertical Alignment of Process Models – How Can We Get There?. In: Halpin, T., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2009 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01861-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01862-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics