Abstract
In the agile approach, the self-organizing team itself decides how work is coordinated. For individuals in a team to be motivated and satisfied with their job they need to have control over their work and over the scheduling and implementation of their own tasks. However, individual and team level autonomy may conflict, and reduce the effectiveness of the team. Therefore, there is a need to investigate how to achieve empowerment at the individual and team levels simultaneously. An Australian software developer, Atlassian, has developed an interesting way of solving these problems with FedEx Day. Once every three months, developers get a day to work on whatever they like! Like an express courier, a developer must deliver something in a day. Developers then present their work to the rest of the company. Some of this work then ends up getting incorporated into the products.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Langfred, C.W.: The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, 563–585 (2000)
Gagne, M., Deci, E.: Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 26, 331–362 (2005)
Osterloh, M., Frey, B.: Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science 11, 538–550 (2000)
Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K.P.: Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 24, 148–166 (2007)
Foss, K., Foss, N., Klein, P.: Original and Derived Judgment: An Entrepreneurial Theory of Economic Organization. Organization Studies 28, 1–20 (2007)
Boehm, B.W., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Barker, J.R.: Tightening the Iron Cage - Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 408–437 (1993)
Markham, S.E., Markham, I.S.: Self-management and self-leadership reexamined: A levels-of-analysis perspective. The Leadership Quarterly 6, 343–359 (1995)
Trist, E.: The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program. Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre, Ontario (1981)
Guzzo, R.A., Dickson, M.W.: Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47, 307–338 (1996)
Parker, S., Wall, T., Jackson, P.: That’s Not My Job: Developing Flexible Employee Work Orientations. Academy of Management Journal 40, 899–929 (1997)
Volberda, H.W., Lewin, A.L.: Co-evolutionary Dynamics Within and Between Firms: From Evolution to Co-evolution. The Journal of management studies 40, 2111 (2003)
Tata, J., Prasad, S.: Team Self-management, Organizational Structure, and Judgments of Team Effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues 16, 248–265 (2004)
Deci, E., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., Leone, D.: Facilitating Internalization: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Personality 62, 119–142 (1994)
Baard, P., Deci, E., Ryan, R.: Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Weil-Being in Two Work Settings 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34, 2045–2068 (2004)
Deci, E., Ryan, R., Gagne, M., Leone, D., Usunov, J., Kornazheva, B.: Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 930 (2001)
Gagne, M., Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M.: Facilitating Acceptance of Organizational Change: The Importance of Self-Determination 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 1843–1852 (2000)
Amabile, T.: The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 357–376 (1983)
Grolnick, W., Ryan, R.: Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 890–898 (1987)
Benware, C., Deci, E.: Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set. American Educational Research Journal 21, 755 (1984)
Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B.: Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 42, 58–74 (1999)
Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Morgan, G.: Images of Organizations. SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Barney, H.T., Moe, N.B., Dybå, T., Aurum, A., Winata, M. (2009). Balancing Individual and Collaborative Work in Agile Teams. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Maurer, F. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01853-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01853-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01852-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01853-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)