Abstract
This paper further examines why some software development organizations decide not to adopt CMMI by replicating an earlier Australian study in another country. The study examines data collected from the efforts of three consulting firms to sell a CMMI Level 2 program subsidized by the Malaysian government. The most frequently cited reasons for not adopting CMMI were: the program was too costly; the companies were unsure of the benefits; the organization was too small; and/or the organization had other priorities. The Malaysian study extends and generally supports the Australian study (differences were found in the frequency ordering of reasons and two new reason categories had to be introduced). It also adds to our understanding of CMMI adoption decisions. Based on the results, we conclude that to achieve broader impact in practice, software process improvement (SPI) researchers need to develop a stronger cost-benefit analysis for SPI, recognising it as a business investment rather than just a product or process quality improvement technique, and provide flexible entry options to enable more companies of difference sizes to take the adoption leap.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamsson, P., Iivari, N.: Commitment in Software Process Improvement: In Search of the Process. In: Proceedings of 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2002), vol. 8. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2002)
Alstrom, D., Bruton, G.: Turnaround in Asia: What do we know? Asia Pac. J. Manage. 21, 5–24 (2004)
Baddoo, N., Hall, T.: De-motivators for Software Process Improvement: an Analysis of Practitioners’ Views. J. Syst. & Softw. 66(1), 23–33 (2003)
Brodman, J.G., Johnson, D.L.: What Small Business and Small Organizations Say about the CMM: Experience Report. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1994), pp. 331–340. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1994)
Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Investigating Software Process in Practice: A Grounded Theory Perspective. J. Syst. & Softw. 81(5), 772–784 (2008)
Conradi, R., Fuggetta, A.: Improving software process improvement. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 92–99 (2002)
Fink, D., Laupase, R.: Perceptions of Web Site Design Characteristics: A Malaysian/ Australian Comparison. Internet Res. 10(1), 44–55 (2000)
Gibson, R.: Software Process Improvement: Innovation and Diffusion. In: Larsen, T.J., McGuire, E. (eds.) Information Systems Innovation and Diffusion: Issues and Directions, pp. 71–87. Idea Group Publishing (1998)
Guerrero, F., Eterovic, Y.: Adopting the SW-CMM in Small IT Organizations. IEEE Softw. 21(4), 29–35 (2004)
Hansen, B., Rose, J., Tjørnehøj, G.: Prescription, Description, Reflection: The Shape of the Software Process Improvement Field. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 24(6), 457–472 (2004)
Hersleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Siegel, J., Zubrow, D.: Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-94-TR-013 (August 1994)
Hofstede, G.J.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York (2004)
Humphrey, W.S.: Software Process Improvement – A Personal View: How it Started and Where it is Going. Softw. Process Improv. & Pract. 12(3), 223–227 (2007)
Mehta, C.R., Patel, N.R.: ALGORITHM 643: FEXACT: a FOTRAN Subroutine for Fisher’s Exact Test on Unordered rxc Contingency Tables. ACM Trans. on Math. Softw. 12(2), 154–161 (1986)
National SME Development Council: Definitions for Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia (2005)
Niazi, M., Ali Babar, M., Katugampola, N.M.: Demotivators of Software Process Improvement: An Empirical Investigation. Softw. Process Improv. & Pract. 13(3), 249–264 (2008)
R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2005)
Richardson, I., von Wangenheim, C.G.: Why Are Small Software Organizations Different. IEEE Softw. 24(1), 18–22 (2007)
Shull, F.J., Carver, J.C., Vegas, S., Juristo, N.: The role of replications in Empirical Software Engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 211–218 (2008)
Smith, P.B.: Organizational Behaviour and National Culture. Br. J. Manage. 3(1), 39–50 (1992)
Staples, M., Niazi, M., Jeffery, R., Abrahams, A., Byatt, P., Murphy, R.: An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI. J Syst. & Softw. 80(6), 883–895 (2007)
Staples, M., Niazi, M.: Systematic Review of Organizational Motivations for Adopting CMM-based SPI. Inform. & Softw. Technol. 50(7/8), 605–620 (2008)
Trewin, D.: Small Business in Australia: 2001. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1321.0 (2002)
Wilkie, F.G., Rombach, D., Penn, M.L., Jeffery, R., Herndon, M.A., Konrad, M.: Motivating Small to Medium Sized Enterprises to Adopt Software Process. In: Proceedings of the International Process Research Consortium (October 2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khurshid, N., Bannerman, P.L., Staples, M. (2009). Overcoming the First Hurdle: Why Organizations Do Not Adopt CMMI. In: Wang, Q., Garousi, V., Madachy, R., Pfahl, D. (eds) Trustworthy Software Development Processes. ICSP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5543. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01680-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01680-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01679-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01680-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)