Advertisement

Dynamic COQUALMO: Defect Profiling over Development Cycles

  • Dan Houston
  • Douglas Buettner
  • Myron Hecht
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5543)

Abstract

Various techniques have been used for managing software quality, including those that predict defect counts over time. This paper introduces a simulation model based on COQUALMO, which can be calibrated to organizational process performance for estimating counts of residual defects. This simulator has the additional benefit of producing a set of estimated defectivity profiles over a software development cycle. Such a set of profiles can be used to support quality management decisions regarding the amount and level of defect removal activities to be applied during a development cycle.

Keywords

Defect profile COQUALMO defect introduction and removal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Hamid, T.K., Madnick, S.E.: Software Project Dynamics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buettner, D.J.: Designing an Optimal Software Intensive System Acquisition: A Game Theoretic Approach. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Card, D.N.: Managing Software Quality with Defects. Crosstalk 16(3), 4–7 (2003), http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2003/03/mar03.pdf (accessed July 22, 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, K.S., Bae, D.H.: COCOMO II-based dynamic software process simulation modeling method. Technical report CS-TR-2006-261, Computer Science Department, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea (2006) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Creveling, C.M., Slutsky, J., Antis, D.: Design for Six Sigma in Technology and Product Development. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devnani-Chulani, S.: Results of Delphi for the Defect Introduction Model - Sub-Model of the Cost/Quality Model Extension to COCOMO II. Technical Report USC-CSE-97-504, University of Southern California (1997), http://sunset.usc.edu/publications/TECHRPTS/1997/usccse97-505/usccse97-505.pdf (accessed July 24, 2008)
  7. 7.
    Devnani-Chulani, S.: Modeling Software Defect Introduction and Removal: COQUALMO (COnstructive QUALity MOdel). Technical Report USC-CSE-99-510, University of Southern California (1999), http://sunset.usc.edu/publications/TECHRPTS/1999/usccse99-510/usccse99-510.pdf (accessed July 23, 2008)
  8. 8.
    Devnani-Chulani, S.: Bayesian Analysis of Software Cost and Quality Models. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California (May 1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaffney, J.: Some Models for Software Defect Analysis. In: Lockheed Martin Software Engineering Workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland (November 1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kan, S.H.: Models and Metrics in Software Quality Engineering, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Modroiu, E.R., Schieferdecker, I.: Defect Rate Profile in Large Software-Systems. In: Tyugu, E., Yamaguchi, T. (eds.) Proc. of the 7th Joint Conference on Knowledge-Based Software Engineering. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madachy, R., Boehm, B.: Assessing Quality Processes with ODC COQUALMO. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.) ICSP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5007, pp. 198–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2008); R. Madachy also discusses the ODC COQUALMO model in Software Process Dynamics. Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Putnam, L.H., Myers, W.: Familiar Metric Management—Reliability (1995), http://www.qsm.com/fmm_03.pdf (accessed July 21, 2008)
  14. 14.
    Schick, G.J., Wolverton, R.W.: An Analysis of Competing Software Reliability Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 4(2), 104–120 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seider, R.: Implementing Phase Containment Effectiveness Metrics at Motorola. Crosstalk 19(11), 12–14 (2006), http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2006/11/index.html (accessed July 22, 2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tawileh, A., McIntosh, S., Work, B., Ivins, W.: The Dynamics of Software Testing. In: Proceedings of the 25th System Dynamics Conference, July 29- August 2. MIT, Boston (2007), http://systemdynamics.org/conferences/2007/proceed/papers/TAWIL320.pdf (accessed October 7, 2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thangarajan, M., Biswas, B.: Mathematical Model for Defect Prediction across Software Development Life Cycle (2000), http://www.qaiindia.com/conferences/SEPG2000/Selected/Best%20Practices/M%20Thangarajan%20&%20Biswajit%20Biswas.doc (accessed July 22, 2008)
  18. 18.
    Trachtenberg, M.: Discovering how to ensure software reliability. RCA Engineer, 53–57 (January–February 1982) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trachtenberg, M.: A General Theory of Software-Reliability Modeling. IEEE Transactions of Reliability 39(1), 92–96 (1990)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Houston
    • 1
  • Douglas Buettner
    • 1
  • Myron Hecht
    • 1
  1. 1.The Aerospace CorporationLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations