Skip to main content

FPTC: Automated Safety Analysis for Domain-Specific Languages

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5421))

Abstract

Critical systems must be shown to be acceptably safe to deploy and use in their environment. The size, scale, heterogeneity, and distributed nature of these increasingly complex systems makes them difficult to verify and analyse. Additionally, domain experts use a variety of languages to model and build their systems. We present an automated safety analysis technique, Fault Propagation and Transformation Analysis, and explain how it can be used for automatically calculating the failure behaviour of an entire system from the failure behaviours of its components. We outline an implementation of the technique in the Epsilon model management platform, allowing it to be used with state-of-the-art model management languages and tools, and making it applicable to a variety of different domain-specific modelling languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conmy, P., Paige, R.: Challenges when using Model-Driven Architecture in the development of safety critical software. In: Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Model-Based Methodologies for Pervasive and Embedded Software. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Systems Journal 45(3), 621–646 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Efftinge, S.: xText reference document (2007), www.eclipse.org/gmt/oaw

  4. Fenelon, P., McDermid, J.A.: An integrated toolset for software safety analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software 21(3), 279–290 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grunske, L.: Towards an integration of standard component-based safety evaluation techniques with saveCCM. In: Hofmeister, C., Crnković, I., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4214, pp. 199–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Heitmeyer, C.L., Kirby, J., Labaw, B.G., Archer, M., Bharadwaj, R.: Using abstraction and model checking to detect safety violations in requirements specifications. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 24(11), 927–948 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. IEC. Analysis techniques for system reliability: Procedures for failure mode and effect analysis. International Standard 812. IEC Geneva (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jürjens, J.: Model-based security engineering with UML. In: Aldini, A., Gorrieri, R., Martinelli, F. (eds.) FOSAD 2005. LNCS, vol. 3655, pp. 42–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolovos, D., Paige, R., Polack, F.: The Epsilon Transformation Language. In: Vallecillo, A., Gray, J., Pierantonio, A. (eds.) ICMT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5063, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolovos, D., Paige, R., Polack, F.: On the evolution of OCL for capturing structural constraints in modelling languages. In: Rigorous Object-Oriented Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F.: Epsilon model management platform (2008), www.eclipse.org/gmt/epsilon

  12. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.: The Epsilon Object Language (EOL). In: Rensink, A., Warmer, J. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4066, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. McDermid, J.A., Nicholson, M., Pumfrey, D.J., Fenelon, P.: Experience with the application of HAZOP to computer-based systems. In: Compass 1995: 10th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance, Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 37–48. National Institute of Standards and Technology (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simpson, H.R.: The MASCOT method. Software Engineering Journal 1(3), 103–120 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace, M.: Modular architectural representation and analysis of fault propagation and transformation. In: FESCA 2005. ENTCS. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paige, R.F., Rose, L.M., Ge, X., Kolovos, D.S., Brooke, P.J. (2009). FPTC: Automated Safety Analysis for Domain-Specific Languages. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (eds) Models in Software Engineering. MODELS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5421. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01647-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01648-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics