Skip to main content

Reputation and regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reputation Capital

Abstract

Where information asymmetries are inherent in markets, reputation serves as an enforcement mechanism. Regulation takes the task of informing participants of their counterparties’ standing by sending quality signals to support their reputation, thus allowing for efficient trade. Effective regulation creates expectations, which may force regulators to assume responsibility for the quality signals issued. The extent of both financial and reputational risk to which governments are exposed in financial markets requires strong regulation with clear rules for predictable intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof G (1970) The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 84 No 3 pp 488-500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Economist (2008) Banker’s Trust. The Economist, 24 Apr. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  3. Economist (2008) Mewling and puking. How damaged is the Basel 2 accord? The Economist, 23 October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Economist (2009) A special report on the future of finance. The Economist, 24 January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleischer H (2001) Informationsasymmetrie im Vertragsrecht. C. H. Beck, MĂĽnchen

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodhart CAE (1998) Financial Regulation – why, how and where now? Routledge Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gratwohl N (2009) Ergebnisse lösen Flucht aus. Handelszeitung, 21 January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Group of Thirty (2009) Financial Reform – A Framework for Financial Stability. (Special Report by the Working Group on Financial Reform, Washington, DC)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey MG, Lusch RF (1999) Balancing the Intellectual Capital Books: Intangible Liabilities. European Management Journal, Vol 17 No 1 pp 85-92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herbig P, Milewicz J, Golden J (1994) A Model of Reputation Building and Destruction. Journal of Business Research, Vol 31 No 1 pp 23-31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunziker S (2007) Das Prinzipal-Agent-Problem im schweizerischen Vertragsrecht. Thesis, University of Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 3 pp 305-360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipton E, Labaton S (2008) A Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed. The New York Times, 16 November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mazumder S (2006) Finanzmarktregulierung im Spannungsfeld von Überregulierung und Deregulierung. Der Schweizer Treuhänder, Vol 8 pp 519-523

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nobel P (1994) Die Nationalbank als Lender of Last Resort – ein leeres Versprechen oder Notrecht? In: Walder HU, Jaag T, Zobl D (eds) Aspekte des Wirtschaftsrechts, Festgabe zum Schweizerischen Juristentag. Schulthess, Zürich, pp 497-510

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nuoy D (2008) Supervisory perspectives. Journal of Financial Stability, Vol 4 pp 346-350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. NZZ (2008) Bestrafter Hochmut. Neue ZĂĽrcher Zeitung, 18 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. NZZ (2008) Die Wallstreet traut dem Markt nicht mehr. Neue ZĂĽrcher Zeitung, 18 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pacheco JM, Traulsen A, Ohtsuki H, Nowak MA (2008) Repeated games and direct reciprocity under active linking. Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol 250 pp 723-731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paganini R (2008) Das Auto steht im Zentrum, der Rest ist sekundär. TagesAnzeiger, 25 November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  22. Raar J (2008) The new global accounting community: Rationale for dialogue to establish is accountability? Critical Perspectives on Accounting

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sanger DE (2009) Nationalization Gets a New, Serious Look. The New York Times, 26 January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schweizerische Nationalbank (2007) Die Banken in der Schweiz 2007 (Information made available by the Swiss National Bank, Bern)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schweizerische Kreditanstalt (1957) 101. Geschäftsbericht. Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro C (1983) Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 98 No 4 pp 659-680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith A (1766) Lectures on Jurisprudence – Part II. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spence M (1973) Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 88 pp 355-374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Swiss Federal Department of Finance (2008) Botschaft zu einem Mass-nahmenpaket zur Stärkung des schweizerischen Finanzsystems. Federal Finance Administration, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swiss Federal Department of Finance (2006) Swiss financial centre and financial market policy. Federal Finance Administration, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  31. UBS AG (2008) Financial Reporting, Third Quarter 2008

    Google Scholar 

  32. vd Crone HC (1993) Rahmenverträge. Schulthess, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  33. vd Crone HC (2000) Verantwortlichkeit, Anreize und Reputation in der Corporate Governance der Publikumsgesellschaft. ZSR 119 (2000) II pp 239-275

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wall Street Journal (2008) Behind AIG’s Fall, Risk Models Failed to Pass Real-World Test. The Wall Street Journal, 31 October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wall Street Journal (2008) The Isle that Rattled the World. The Wall Street Journal, 27 December 2008

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wall Street Journal (2008) Unlocking Europe’s Supervisory Borders. The Wall Street Journal, 28 October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wall Street Journal (2009) Let’s Write the Rating Agencies Out of Our Law. The Wall Street Journal, 2 January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wallman SMH (1995) The future of accounting and disclosure in an evolving world; the need for dramatic change. Accounting Horizons, Vol 3 pp 81-91

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weber RH, Kaufmann C (2008) Haftung für mangelnde staatliche Aufsicht im Finanzmarktbereich. HAVE 3/2008 pp 6-12

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zeller E (1981) Treu und Glauben und Rechtsmissbrauchsverbot. Schulthess, ZĂĽrich

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou M, Dresner M, Windle RJ (2008) Online reputation systems: Design and strategic practices. Decision Support Systems, Vol 44 pp 785-797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zurich Financial Services (2007) Capital Management. Presentation at Zurich Financial Services Investor’s Day, 28 Mar. 2007. London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von der Crone, H.C., Vetsch, J. (2009). Reputation and regulation. In: Klewes, J., Wreschniok, R. (eds) Reputation Capital. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01630-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics