Skip to main content

Numerical Verification Assessment in Computational Biomechanics

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5492))

Abstract

In this paper, we present several aspects of the recent project PROREOP developing a new prognosis system for optimizing patient-specific preoperative surgical planning for the human skeletal system. We address verification and validation assessment in PROREOP with special emphasis on numerical accuracy and performance. To assess numerical accuracy, we propose to employ graded instruments, including accuracy tests and error analysis. The use of such instruments is exemplified for the process of accurate femur reconstruction. Moreover, we show how to verify the simulation results and take into account measurement uncertainties for a part of this process using tools and techniques developed in the project TellHIM&S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Oberkampf, W.L., Trucano, T.G., Hirsch, C.: Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Technical Report SAND2003-3769, Sandia National Laboratories (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASME Committee (PT60) on Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics: Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, A.E., Ellis, B.J., Weiss, J.A.: Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 10(3), 171–184 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Einarsson, B. (ed.): Accuracy And Reliability in Scientific Computing. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, U.S. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kreinovich, V., Beck, J., Ferregut, C., Sanchez, A., Keller, G.R., Averill, M., Starks, S.A.: Monte-Carlo-type techniques for processing interval uncertainty, and their engineering applications. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Reliable Engineering Computing, Savannah, GA, September 2004, pp. 139–160 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Auer, E., Luther, W.: SmartMOBILE — An environment for guaranteed multibody modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics ICINCO (2007) ISBN: 978-972-8865-87-0

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schlesinger, S.: Terminology for model credibility. Simulation 32(3), 103–104 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kochs, H.D.: Key factors of dependability of mechatronic units: Mechatronic dependability. In: 28th Annual International Computer Software and Application Conference (COMP-SAC 2004), Hong Kong, China, pp. 584–586. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. On Uncertainty Management, E.P.G.: Uncertainty in Industrial Practice — A guide to quantitative uncertainty management. Wiley, Chichester (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hörsken, C., Traczinski, H.: Modeling of multibody systems with interval arithmetic. In: Krämer, W., van Gudenberg, J.W. (eds.) Scientific Computing, Validated Numerics, Interval Methods, pp. 317–328. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Luther, W., Dyllong, E., Fausten, D., Otten, W., Traczinski, H.: Numerical verification and validation of kinematics and dynamical models for flexible robots in complex environment. In: Kulisch, U., Lohner, R., Facius, A. (eds.) Perspectives on Enclosure Methods, pp. 181–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Rauh, A.: Theorie und Anwendung von Intervallmethoden für Analyse und Entwurf robuster und optimaler Regelungen dynamischer Systeme. Ph.D thesis, University of Ulm (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cuypers, R., Tang, Z., Luther, W., Pauli, J.: A parametrized model for efficient and accurate femur reconstruction using model-based segmentation and superquadric shapes. In: I-ASTED, Baltimore (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kecskeméthy, A.: Objektorientierte Modellierung der Dynamik von Mehrkörpersystemen mit Hilfe von Übertragungselementen. Ph.D thesis, Gerhard Mercator Universität Duisburg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Auer, E.: SmartMOBILE: A framework for reliable modeling and simulation of kinematics and dynamcis of mechanical systems. Ph.D thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen. WiKu Verlag Dr. Stein (2007) ISBN: 978-3-86553-240-4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nedialkov, N.S.: The design and implementation of an object-oriented validated ODE solver. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Auer, E., Rauh, A., Hofer, E.P., Luther, W.: Validated Modeling of Mechanical Systems with SmartMOBILE: Improvement of Performance by ValEncIA-IVP. In: Hertling, P., Hoffmann, C.M., Luther, W., Revol, N. (eds.) Real Number Algorithms. LNCS, vol. 5045, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Eble, I.: RiOT, http://iamlasun8.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ae08/

  19. Berz, M., Makino, K.: COSY INFINITY 9.0. Programmer’s manual. Technical Report MSUHEP 060803, Michigan State University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stark, T., Kecskeméthy, A., Tändl, M.: Application of MOBILE for an improved kinematical model using motion- and MRI measurements. In: The 15th European Conference on Mathematics for Industry, London, England, June 30 - July 4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neumaier, A.: Taylor forms — use and limits. Reliable Computing 9, 43–79 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Auer, E., Luther, W. (2009). Numerical Verification Assessment in Computational Biomechanics. In: Cuyt, A., Krämer, W., Luther, W., Markstein, P. (eds) Numerical Validation in Current Hardware Architectures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5492. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01591-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01591-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01590-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01591-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics