Skip to main content

Mean-Variance Versus Minimum-Variance Hedging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 959 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 625))

Abstract

The hedging model introduced in this chapter is an extension of the expected utility approach in Chap. 2 The importing firm’s hedging problem here is almost identical to the one before. The only difference is that this model allows for basis risk. This is important with regard to the definition of backwardation applied. While in the previous chapter backwardation is defined as the difference between the expected spot price and the current futures price (i.e., \(\tilde{{e}}_{1} - {f}_{0}\)), here, backwardation is defined as the difference between the expected futures price and the current futures price (i.e., \(\tilde{{f}}_{1} - {f}_{0}\)). Note that these two definitions of backwardation are equal in the absence of basis risk (i.e., if \(\tilde{{e}}_{1} =\tilde{ {f}}_{1}\)). However, aside from basis risk, the model framework is quite different, since the analysis in this chapter is based on the mean-variance concept. Nevertheless, this approach can be regarded as an extension, since mean-variance models are generally not in conflict with expected utility models.1 On the contrary, mean-variance models have several attractive properties that may add additional insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See e.g., Battermann, Broll, and Wahl (2002) and Broll, Wahl, and Wong (2006).

  2. 2.

    Note that the only difference to the model in the previous chapter is that basis risk is not absent. Hence, \(\tilde{{e}}_{1}\neq \tilde{{f}}_{1}\).

  3. 3.

    For more information on the properties of expectations operators, variances, and covariances, see e.g., Pindyck and Rubinfeld (1998).

  4. 4.

    See e.g., Kahl (1983).

  5. 5.

    The condition for a maximum

    $$\frac{{\delta }^{2}\Omega } {\delta {h}^{2}} = -2V (\tilde{{f}}_{1})\lambda < 0$$

    is fulfilled given risk aversion (i.e., λ > 0).

  6. 6.

    See e.g., Frechette (2000) and Jin and Koo (2006).

  7. 7.

    Again, these definitions of backwardation are equal if basis risk is absent (i.e., if \(\tilde{{e}}_{1} =\tilde{ {f}}_{1}\)).

  8. 8.

    See e.g., Briys and Schlesinger (**1993), Briys et al. (**1993) and Duffie (1989).

  9. 9.

    For a similar graphical representation of demand curves for hedging goods, see Frechette (2000) and Jin and Koo (2006).

  10. 10.

    The graphical representation of the hedgers’ surplus resembles the standard consumers’ surplus in economic theory.

  11. 11.

    An alternative derivation of the hedgers’ surplus is presented in the appendix.

  12. 12.

    For similar findings see e.g., Franckle (1980), Johnson (1960), McKinnon (1967), and Vukina, Li, and Holthausen (1996).

  13. 13.

    To make this point clearer, note that the optimal hedge ratio can be rewritten as

    $$\frac{h} {x} = \frac{Cov(\tilde{{e}}_{1},\tilde{{f}}_{1})} {V (\tilde{{f}}_{1})} = \frac{Cov(\tilde{{e}}_{1},\tilde{{f}}_{1})} {std{(\tilde{{f}}_{1})}^{2}} = \rho \frac{std(\tilde{{e}}_{1})} {std(\tilde{{f}}_{1})}.$$

    If spot and futures prices are perfectly correlated (i.e., ρ = 1) and share the same standard deviation (i.e., \(\frac{std(\tilde{{e}}_{1})} {std(\tilde{{f}}_{1})} = 1\)), the “equal and opposite” hedging strategy is optimal. See Haigh and Holt (2000) for more information.

  14. 14.

    For additional information see Hauser and Neff (1993).

  15. 15.

    See e.g., Brooks (2002) and Lence and Hayes (1994).

References

  1. Brooks, C. (2002). Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duffie, D. (1989). Futures markets. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ederington, L. H. (1979). The hedging performance of the new futures market. Journal of Finance, 34, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Franckle, C. T. (1980). The hedging performance of the new futures market: Comment. Journal of Finance, 35, 1273–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frechette, D. L. (2000). The demand for hedging and the value of hedging opportunities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 897–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heifner, R. G. (1972). Optimal hedging levels and hedging effectiveness in cattle feeding. Agricultural Economic Research, 24, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, L. L. (1960). The theory of hedging and speculation in commodity futures. Review of Economic Studies, 27, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahl, K. H. (1983). Determination of the recommended hedging ratio. American Journal of Agri- cultural Economics, 65, 603–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lence, S. H. (1995a). The economic value of minimum-variance hedges. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McKinnon, R. I. (1967). Futures markets, buffer stocks, and income stability for primary producers. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 844–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Working, H. (1953). Futures trading and hedging. American Economic Review, 43, 314–343.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benninga, S., Eldor, R., & Zilcha, I. (1984). The optimal hedge ratio in unbiased futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 4, 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Battermann, H. L., Broll, U., & Wahl, J. E. (2002). Insurance demand and the elasticity of risk aversion. OR Spectrum, 24, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Econometric models and economic forecasts. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jin, H. J., & Koo, W. W. (2006). Offshore hedging strategy of Japan-based wheat traders under multiple sources of risk and hedging costs. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 220–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Broll, U., & Eckwert, B. (1996). Cross hedging of exchange rate risk. Review of International Economics, 4, 282–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heifner, R. G. (1973). Hedging potential in grain storage and livestock feeding. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vukina, T., Li., D. F., & Holthausen, D. M. (1996). Hedging with crop yield futures: A mean-variance analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 1015–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haigh, M. S., & Holt, M. T. (2000). Hedging multiple price uncertainty in international grain trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 881–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hauser, R. J., & Neff, D. (1993). Export/import risks at alternative stages of U.S. grain export trade. Journal of Futures Markets, 13, 579–595.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lence, S. H. (1996). Relaxing the assumptions of minimum-variance hedging. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lence, S. H., & Hayes, D. J. (1994). The empirical minimum-variance hedge. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawtrey, R. G. (1940). A symposium on the theory of the forward market: Mr. Kaldor on the for- ward market. Review of Economic Studies, 7, 196–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Röthig .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Röthig, A. (2009). Mean-Variance Versus Minimum-Variance Hedging. In: Microeconomic Risk Management and Macroeconomic Stability. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 625. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01565-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01565-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01564-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01565-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics