Advertisement

Talking about ABSS: Functional Descriptions of Models

  • Scott Moss
Conference paper
  • 673 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5466)

Abstract

Social simulation research lacks a common framework within which to integrate empirical and abstract models. This lack reflects an epistemological divide within the field. In an attempt to span that divide and in hope that it will lead to subsequent work on integrating abstract and empirical agent based social modelling research, I suggest here that a possibly suitable framework would derive from the mathematical notion of a function as a mapping between a well specified domain and a well specified range. The use of the function as an informal framework for the discussion of epistemological issues such as prediction, validation and verification is demonstrated as well as its use for structuring controversy about modelling techniques and applications. An example is drawn from the literature on opinion dynamics to explore the latter use.

Keywords

Agent-based social simulation validation verification model space opinion dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Edmonds, B.: Assessing the safety of (numerical) representation in social simulation. In: Agent-based computational modelling, pp. 195–214. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deffuant, G.: Comparing extremism propagation patterns in continuous opinion models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edmonds, B., Moss, S.: Modelling learning as modelling. Cybernetics and Systems 29, 5–37 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fama, E.F.: Mandelbrot and the stable paretian hypothesis. Journal of Business 36(4), 420–429 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedman, M.: The methodology of positive economics. In: Essays on Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moss, S., Edmonds, B.: Sociology and simulation: Statistical and qualitative cross-validation. American Journal of Sociology 110(4), 1095–1131 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phillips, P.C.B., Perron, P.: Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2), 335–346 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Terán, O.: Emergent Tendencies in Multi-Agent-based Simulations using Constraint-based Methods to Effect Practical Proofs over Finite Subsets of Simulation Outcomes. PhD thesis, Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University Business School (2001), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep86.html
  9. 9.
    Tobin, J.: Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. The Review of Economic Studies 25(2), 65–86 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Moss
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Policy ModellingManchester Metropolitan University Business SchoolUK

Personalised recommendations