Advertisement

The Fashioning of Dynamic Competitive Advantage of Entrepreneurial Cities: Role of Social and Political Entrepreneurship

  • Lata ChatterjeeEmail author
  • T.R. Lakshmanan
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

There has been a major change, over the last three decades, in the functions, policy mechanisms, and the spatial forms of many urban regions in the highly industrialized countries in North America and Europe. These transformations reflect these cities’ roles as key actors and sites of change in the contemporaneous process of globalization, and the constituent economic, social and spatial restructuring. The term “Entrepreneurial City” pertains to this emerging urban entity.

Lakshmanan and Chatterjee (2003, 2004, 2006; Chatterjee and Lakshmanan 2005a, b) have argued that a variety of change processes have converged in recent years to create a new global environment in which three types of change agents have collaborated to effectuate a major economic and spatial evolution in the form of a global production system and the rise of the entrepreneurial city (Fig. 7.1). Such change processes comprise of three types: (a) multiplicity of knowledge-rich material (transportation, communications and production) technologies and infrastructures which have made economically feasible production systems spanning the globe; (b) the advent of neoliberal ideologies which have spawned many nonmaterial (institutional and organizational) technologies and infrastructure which have dropped institutional barriers to and promoted freer cross-border flows of goods, services, finance and knowledge; and (c) secular economic changes such as the rise of quality competition and demand for variety, and the weakening of earlier macroeconomic management apparatus (e.g., Keynesian). These change processes collectively facilitate a global “space of flows” of goods, services, capital, knowledge and technology, and enable a globally distributed production system. In effect, these three classes of change forces create a new context or stage or arena for action by the economic, political, and social actors of the emerging global system.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Actor Social Entrepreneur Social Sector Political Entrepreneur Community Development Block Grant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acs ZJ, de Groot HLF, Nijkamp P (eds) (2002) The emergence of the knowledge economy. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. William Baumol J (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. J Polit Econ 98:893–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornstein D (2004) How to change the world: social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatterjee L, Lakshmanan TR (2005a) The dual bottom line: complementarities between urban social and economic entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Tinbergen Conference, George Mason University, July 10–11Google Scholar
  5. Chatterjee L, Lakshmanan TR (2005b) Urban social and political entrepreneurship: attributes and complementarities. Paper presented at the Special Workshop at Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden, June 16–18Google Scholar
  6. Downs A (1997) Economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Habermas J (1984) Reason and rationalization of society. Theory of Communicative Action, vol 1. Beacon, Boston (English translation by Thomas McCarthy)Google Scholar
  8. Hebert RF, Link AN (1982) The entrepreneur: mainstream views and radical critique. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Jessop B (1997) The entrepreneurial city: reimaging localities, redesigning economic governance, or restucturing capital. In: Jewson N, Macgregor S (eds) Transforming cities. Routledge, London, pp 29–41Google Scholar
  10. Kirzner I (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Knight F (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Houghton Mifflin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Lakshmanan TR, Chatterjee L (2003) The entrepreneurial city and the global economy. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Modern Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Policy, The Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, May 23–24Google Scholar
  13. Lakshmanan TR, Chatterjee L (2004) Entrepreneurship and innovation-led regional growth: the case of the entrepreneurial urban place. Paper presented at the 51st North American Regional Science International, Seattle, November 11–13Google Scholar
  14. Lakshmanan TR, Chatterjee L (2006) The entrepreneurial city in the global marketplace. Int J Entrepreneurship Innov Manage 6(3):155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lundwall BA, Johnson B (1994) The learning economy. J Ind Stud 1(2):23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malecki E (1994) Entrepreneurship in regional and local development. Int Reg Sci Rev 16 (1–2):119–154Google Scholar
  17. Schumpeter JA (1928) The instability of capitalism. Econ J 38:361–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Schumpeter JA (1961) The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Schumpeter JA (1984) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Stohr W (1989) Local development strategies to meet local crisis. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 1(3):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Transportation StudiesBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations