Dynamics of Innovation Fields with Endogenous Heterogeneity of People

  • Masahisa FujitaEmail author
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


According to Lester Thurow at MIT, advanced countries are shifting from capitalism based on mass production of commodities to the brain power society in which creation of knowledge and information using brain power plays the central role (Thurow 1996). The concept of brain power society is essentially the same as that of the C-society advocated by Åke Andersson who maintains that advanced countries are leaving the industrial society (with its reliance on simplicity of production and products and the heavy use of natural resources and energy) and entering the C-society with and increasing reliance on creativity, communication capacity, and complexity of products (Andersson 1985). In this paper, the term “brain power society” is synonymous with the “C-society” of Åke Andersson. The ultimate concern of this paper is the further development of the New Economic Geography (NEG) towards a more comprehensive theory of geographical economics in the age of brain power society, in which the dynamics of the spatial economy arise from the dual linkages in the economic and knowledge fields. Before elaborating this ultimate objective, let me explain briefly what is the so-called the New Economic Geography.


Common Knowledge Knowledge Creation Equilibrium Configuration Equilibrium Path Cooperative Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author is grateful to the three anonymous referees and to David Batten, Åke Andersson and other participants in the workshop on “Innovation, Dynamic Regions and Regional Dynamics” for valuable comments on the earlier drafts of this paper. The author is also grateful for Grants Aid for Scientific Research Grants S 13851002 and A 18203016 from the Japanese Ministry of Education and Science.


  1. Andersson ÅE (1985) Kreativitet: storstadens framtid. Prisma, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin R, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G, Robert-Nicoud F (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berliant M, Fujita M (2007) Knowledge creation as a square dance on the Hilbert cube. Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto (mimeo)Google Scholar
  4. Fujita M (2005) Spatial economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujita M, Krugman P (2004) The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Pap Reg Sci 83:149–164Google Scholar
  6. Fujita M, Mori T (2005) Frontiers of the new economic geography. Pap Reg Sci 84(3):377–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:2–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Porter ME (1998) On competition. A Harvard business review book. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Thurow LC (1996) The future of capitalism. Leighco, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Zipf G (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Konan UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations