Skip to main content

The Genesis and Evolution of the Stockholm Music Cluster

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Directions in Regional Economic Development

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Why do superstars like and Bon Jovi, Britney Spears, Maddona and Ricky Martin, to an increasing extent choose Swedish composers and producers in an industry characterized by extremely fierce international competition? Bergen, Copenhagen, Dublin, London, Los Angeles, Manchester, New York, Paris and Seattle are some of the more prominent competitors to the Swedish – particularly Stockholm – music clusters. What triggered this evolution and which dynamic forces have been decisive in the creation of the Stockholm cluster? Despite the impressive research presented on spatial issues in the last decade, we know surprisingly little about the forces initiating the creation of clusters. Economic geography models originating in the international trade theory literature, view agglomeration as a function of linkages (pecuniary and non-pecuniary), trade costs and scale economies (Krugman 1991; Venables 1996; Fuijita et al. 1996; Braunerhjelm et al. 2000a,b). Still, the focus is rather on the re-location of already existing economic activities than the emergence of new clusters. New constellations of existing clusters that appear as altered trade costs (e.g. due to an integration process) induce a re-shuffling of firms and factors of production, leading to a new pattern of spatial distribution of economic activities. Notwithstanding that these models constitute a true contribution to our understanding of the spatial dimensions of economic activities. Empirical observations also suggest that clusters emerge for quite different reasons, such as exogenous shocks attributed to technological breakthroughs, locational specific factors, historically random events, deregulation, market structure and down-sizing of the government, or the disinvestment of a dominating firm (David 1985; Scott and Storper 1986; Arthur et al. 1987; Arthur 1989; Krugman 1991; Feldman and Francis 2002; Scott 2003; Braunerhjelm and Feldman 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kai R. Lofthus, reporter in the international music magazine Billboard, interviewed by the Swedish newspaper Expressen, March 16, 2002 (Lofthus 2002).

  2. 2.

    See Porter (1990, 2000), Fuijita et al. (1999); Fujita and Thisse (2002); Braunerhjelm and Feldman (2006).

  3. 3.

    Martin and Ottaviano (1999), 2001???); Fujita and Thisse (2002); Maggioni (2006).

  4. 4.

    Hallencreutz et al. (2002) also include a fifth category Equipment, machines and related services (producers and suppliers of studio equipment, instruments, video producers, etc.) which is disregarded in the present study.

  5. 5.

    In the last few years, interviews have increasingly come to be considered as an important complement to statistical/econometric methods in empirical studies. See, e.g., The NBER project on industrial technology and productivity (http://www.nber.org), Borenstein and Farrell (1998) and Scherer’s (1986) earlier criticism of the skepticism of economists’ to use interviews as a complementary method.

  6. 6.

    For a more detailed description of the Swedish music industry, see Hallencreutz (2002), Lundequist (2002) and Hallencreutz et al. (2004).

  7. 7.

    Note the difference between number of firms and employees in the Finnish case. This underlines the data problems and calls for a cautious interpretation.

  8. 8.

    If, as indicated above, a more realistic measure of the number of firms in the Swedish music industry is 1,500, then the share of firms in the music industry declines to 0.20. Assuming that similar measurement problems accrue to the other countries, we stick to the figure of 15,000 firms.

  9. 9.

    For instance, DVDs are now included in the export figures which however mainly reflect exports of films.

  10. 10.

    The presence of “superstars” has been shown to be decisive for other, more research intensive industries, such as biotechnology (Zucker and Darby 1996 ???).

  11. 11.

    For instance, Sahara Hotnights was ranked among the top ten best released records in 2002 by Washington Post.

  12. 12.

    The Cheiron collective was dissolved in August 2000 and the members preferred to continue on an individual basis. Its founding father, Dennis Pop, was instrumental in developing this line of the Swedish music industry.

  13. 13.

    According to the “Culture School”, the costs have not increased, nor has the availability decreased. This is, however, contradicted by both the respondents and earlier studies (Forss 1999).

  14. 14.

    See Hui and Png (2003) and Varian (2000).

  15. 15.

    The protection for originators is now regulated through the recent law on Elektronisk handel (Electronic Trade) (Government bill 2002) and through the EU framework directive On the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (EU 2001).

  16. 16.

    As music production become less profitable, there has been a tendency for an increase in price of live concerts tickets. Krueger (2002) claims that the price has doubled between 1995 and 2001. A similar tendency can be observed in Sweden, judging from income data from concert organizers, which is estimated to have increased throughout the period 1996–2002 (Forss 2003).

  17. 17.

    This is also claimed to be the case for Ireland (Clancy and Twomey 1997).

  18. 18.

    An example is Max Martin (Martin Sandberg), one of the most successful Swedish agents. He has composed/produced music for artists such as Britney Spears and Backstreet Boys.

  19. 19.

    At the same time, Stockholm is naturally not exempt from rivalry and conflicts among agents. This is, however, considered to be less widespread than in many other places.

  20. 20.

    See, e.g. Maskell et al. (1998) and Maskell and Malmberg (1999) for a description of local mechanisms for the diffusion of knowledge.

  21. 21.

    Note that there is an interesting parallel to other industries, e.g. the pharmaceutical industry where “big pharma” (the large companies) co-exist and complement smaller – often “drug discovery” – firms.

  22. 22.

    Another sign is the increased use of artist and repertoire (A&R) staff by record companies, responsible for the image, activities and career development of the artist. A&R is claimed to correspond to R&D in other industries (Clancy and Twomey 1997).

  23. 23.

    In particular, this seems to be the case with Maratone, The Location and A-Side (ex-members of Cheiron) as well as composers and producers connected with, e.g. the music houses Murlyn Songs AB and Tom Bone Music.

  24. 24.

    Preferences seem roughly to be in line with the price iTune (Apple) – which has roughly 70% of the market charge for downloading music, i.e. US $0.99. Competition is however increasing; Loudeye (works with Microsoft), MusicMatch, Napster and Real Networks are other actors. Still, even though iTune is limited in geographical scope, only 14 million songs were downloaded in a year as compared to the free access website Kaaza from which 700 million songs where downloaded. Total on-line sales is estimated to be 1% of the market, but expected to increase to 20–25% in 4–5 years (Financial Times 2003b). Music industry is estimated to have lost about US $3.4 billion due to illegal copying in 2002. The major record producing companies are therefore involved in restructuring, vertical integration, introducing online sales through various means, etc. (Financial Times 2003a).

  25. 25.

    For example, about 175,000 adult education music circles are formed each year.

  26. 26.

    Stig Andersson, Abba’s former manager, played a vital role in the group’s commercial success. Later on he initiated the well-known Polar prize, also referred to as the “Nobel” prize in music.

  27. 27.

    The distribution is quite skewed within the group of 25 companies. One firm accounts for 26% of turnover and 39% of profits (Veckans affärer 2003).

  28. 28.

    The failure rate is much higher in the music industry than in most other industries (Negus 1992).

  29. 29.

    Södra Latins Musikgymnasium and Rytmus Musikgymnasium are senior high schools in Stockholm, specializing in musical studies.

  30. 30.

    The difference between record companies and music houses is that the former own the rights to the recordings while the latter own the rights to the works. This means that record companies sell and market transmitters of sound (CD, vinyl, DVD, etc.), while music houses own and administer the original works/copyrights and license these to record companies, film companies, advertising agencies, etc. Music houses also take care of the originators’ copyrights for existing works that are sold on transmitters, when the work is recorded live, broadcasted on TV, played on the radio, filmed, when music is sold or when texts are printed, etc.

  31. 31.

    Pelle Lidell represents about 40 Swedish composers/producers through the music house Murlyn Songs AB. Ben Malén (previously under the stage name Ben Marlene) represents about 50 Swedish composers/producers at the music house Tom Bone Music.

References

  • Alexander PJ (2002) Peer-to-peer file sharing: the case of the music recording industry. Rev Ind Organ 20:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allansdottir A, Bonaccorsi A, Gambardella A, Mariani M, Orsenigo L, Pamolli F , Riccaboni M (2002) Innovation and competitiveness in European biotechnology. Enterprise Papers 7, Enterprise Directorate General, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur B (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur B, Ermoliev M, Kaniovski M (1987) Adaptive growth processes modeled by Urn schemes. Kibernetika 6:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio E, Yli-Renko H (1998) The network embeddedness of new technology-based firms: developing a systemic evolutionary model. Small Bus Econ 11:253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes TJ, Gertler MS (eds) (1999) The new industrial geography: regions, regulations and institutions. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein S, Farrell J (eds) (1998) Inside the Pin Factory: Empirical Studies Augmented by Manager Interviews. J Ind Econ 46(2):123–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (1999) Industry clusters in Ohio and Sweden, 1975 –1995. Small Bus Econ 12:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm P, Feldman M (2006) Cluster genesis. Oxford University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm P, Faini R, Norman V, Ruane F, Seabright P (2000a) Integration and the regions in Europe: how the right policies can prevent polarization? Monitoring European Integration 10. CEPR, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B, Johansson D, Karaomerliouglu D (2000b) The new and the old: the evolution of biomedical and polymer clusters. J Evol Econ 10:471–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (2004) The music industry clusters in Cleveland. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (mimeo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (ed) (2001) Technological systems in the bioindustries. An international study. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R (1991) On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J Evol Econ 1:93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy P, Twomey M (1997) Clusters in Ireland. The Irish popular music industry: an application of Porter’s cluster analysis. NESC, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark L, Feldman M, Gertler M (2000) The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • David P (1985) Understanding the Economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75:332–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkan J (1994) The economics of the art in Ireland. The Arts Council, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright M (1996) Regional clusters and the economic development: a research agenda. In: Staber U, Schaefer N, Sharma B (eds) Business networks: prospects for regional development. Walter de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2001) 2001/29/EG, On the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Accepted on May 22, 2001, and can be found at http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/multi/digital_rights/doc/directive_copyright_en.pdf

  • Feldman M, Francis J (2002) Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. University of Toronto, Toronto (mimeo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (2003a) Music beats the drum for online sales. 6 June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (2003b) Sony plans to merge music arm with BMG. 16 Oct 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Plersus, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forss K (1999) Att ta sig ton – om svensk musikexport 1974–1999. Ds 1999:28, Expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi, Finansdepartementet (Ministry of Finance)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forss K (2003) The export of Swedish music industry 2002. Report from Music Sweden Industry, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Frostling-Henningsson M, Jacobsson A (2003) Downloading of music from a consumer’s perspective. Markets in the Information Age. The Swedish Competition Authority, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuijita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The spatial economy. Cities, regions and international trade. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration. Cities, industrial location and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallaway T, Kinnear D (2001) Unchained Melodt: a price-discrimination based policy proposal for addressing the MP3 revolution. Rev Ind Organ 35:279–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon I, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes agglomeration and/or social networks. Urban Stud 37:513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government bill (2002) Regeringens proposition 2001/02:150, Lag om elektronisk handel och andra informationssamhällets tjänster. Stockholm, 14 Mar 2002 (Government bill on Electronic Trade implemented on July 1, 2002), downloadable at http://naring.regeringen.se/propositioner_mm/propositioner/pdf/p200102_150.pdf

  • Hallencreutz D (2002) Populärmusik, kluster och industriell konkurrenskraft, En ekonomisk-geografisk studie av svensk musikindustri. Doctoral thesis, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallencreutz D, Lundequist P, Malmberg A (2004) Populärmusik från Svedala. Näringspolitiska lärdomar av det svenska musikundrets framväxt. SNS, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmer S (2003) Will music file sharing over the internet influence the commercial market for pre-recorded music? Markets in the Information Age. The Swedish Competition Authority, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh B (1998) The British dance music industry: a case study of independent cultural production. Br J Sociol 49:234–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch PM (1972) Processing fads and fashions: an organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems. Am J Sociol 77:639–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui KL, Png IPL (2003) Piracy and legitimate demand for recorded music. B E J Econ Anal Policy 2:1–30. http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/lu

  • Klepper S (2004) The geography of organizational knowledge. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg (mimeo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger A (2002) Music sales slump, concert ticket costs jump and rock fans pay the price. The New York Times, 17 Oct 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee R, Willis J (1997) Geographics of economies. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofthus KR (2002) Cited in Expressen, 16 Mar 2002 Article by Lindwall JT and Nordström A

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundequist P (2002) Spatial clustering and industrial competitiveness – studies in economic geography. Dissertation No. 48, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni M (2006) Mors tua, vita mea? The rise and fall of innovative industrial clusters. In: Braunerhjelm F (ed) Cluster genesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Ottaviano G (1999) Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Eur Econ Rev 43:281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Ottaviano G (2001) Growth and agglomeration. Int Econ Rev 42(4):947–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P, Malmberg A (1999) Localized learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge J Econ 23:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P, Eskelinen H, Hannibalsson I, Malmberg A, Vatne E (1998) Competitiveness, localized learning and regional development: specialization and prosperity in small open economies. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Music Board of Ireland (2002) The economic significance of the Irish music industry. Music Board of Ireland, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus K (1992) Producing pop: conflicts and culture in the popular music industry. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R (1993) National systems of innovations. A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) OECD statistical database via Internet

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Q 14:15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1999) The weightless economy in growth. Bus Econ 30:40–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A (1994) Regional networks: industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A (1999) Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneur. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer F (1986) On the current state of knowledge in industrial organization. In: De Jong H, Shephard W (eds) Mainstreams in industrial organization. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (1999) The US recorded music industry: on the relations between organizations, location and creativity in the cultural economy. Environ Plann 31:1965–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (2003) Origins and growth of the Hollywood motion-picture industry: the first three decades. UCLA, Los Angeles (mimeo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A, Storper M (1986) Production, work, territory: the geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism. Unwin Hyman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2002) Data from the central register of enterprises and establishments, 1975–2002. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • STIM Annual report, 1987–1997. Swedish Performing Rights Society, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1998) World culture report. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001) Census of Industrial Production, Washington, D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian H (2000) Buying, sharing and renting information goods. J Ind Econ 48:473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veckans affärer (2003) Så ska det låta 19, pp 24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables A (1996) Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. Int Econ Rev 37:37–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker L, Darby M (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:12709–12716

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Constructive comments from David Audretsch, Magnus Henrekson and participants at a seminar held at Indiana University, have helped to improve the manuscript. Financial support from Vinnova is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pontus Braunerhjelm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Interviews categorized by sectors and individuals:

  • Educational institutions – Principal Gunilla von Bahr at the Royal College of Music, Stockholm (KMH), Deputy Rectors Marie Linde and Gunnar Andersson, in charge of musical studies at Södra Latins Musikgymnasium (public high school), Principal Johanna Österling at Rytmus Musikgymnasium (private high school) 29 Footnote 29 and the head of the cultural schools (primary and secondary level), Hans Skoglund at Stockholms Stads Kulturskola.

  • Composers/producers and music houses 30 Footnote 30 – Andreas Grill, Christian Sandqvist, Andreas Claeson, Peter Hallström, Martin von Schmalensee, Mattias Håkansson, Ben Malén and Pelle Lidell. 31 Footnote 31

  • Record companies – President Niklas Nyman at Music Network (MNW), Vice President Eric Hasselqvist at Stockholm Records and President Per Sundin at Sony Music Nordic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). The Genesis and Evolution of the Stockholm Music Cluster. In: Karlsson, C., Andersson, A., Cheshire, P., Stough, R. (eds) New Directions in Regional Economic Development. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01016-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01017-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics