Advertisement

Off-shoring of Work and London’s Sustainability as an International Financial Centre

  • Ian GordonEmail author
  • Colin Haslam
  • Philip McCann
  • Brian Scott-Quinn
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The emergence, from the 1960s on, of a new spatial division of labor – with the old task-based division of labor within a firm taking on a spatial dimension, and comparative advantage increasingly shaping patterns of specialization by function/process as well as by sector/product – reflected both new possibilities opened up by developments in management, control and communications technologies and intensified competitive pressures within (generally) mature industrial sectors. On an international scale this primarily affected manufacturing activities, and was driven essentially by labor cost factors. Within developed economies, however, it also affected a number of (mostly) office-based service activities, where the crucial cost factor more typically involved premises rather than labor, since these tended to occupy expensive space in central locations offering the face-to-face communication potential required for some at least of their functions. In these cases the new spatial divisions occurred within much more restricted territories, both because there were tighter constraints (on the kinds of labor deemed suitable and on the dispensability of face-to-face contact) and because there was much more local variation in the relevant cost factor. Even so, there were US examples from the 1980s of telecommunications links being used to effect substantial savings in typing/data entry costs by exploiting cheaper pools of English-speaking labor in offshore locations such as Ireland or the West Indies (Warf 1989). Since the end of the 1990s, however, service activities in advanced economies have taken initiatives to shift a much wider range of information-related functions to offshore locations in pursuit of labor cost savings, as they in their turn come to face more intense price competition. In this context, more of the jobs involve high levels of human capital – for which the core economies had been presumed to possess a comparative advantage – raising questions about how far the process could be extended, and whether a number of their advanced service activities, notably “wholesale” financial services, have also become vulnerable to “hollowing out”.

Keywords

Business Process Comparative Advantage Financial Service Hedge Fund Home Basis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Augar P (2000) The death of gentlemanly capitalism. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin M (2003) More than off-shoring: smart-sourcing. Capco Inst J Financ Transform 8(August):95–102Google Scholar
  3. Bronfenbrenner K, Luce S (2004) The changing nature of corporate global restructuring: the impact of production shifts on jobs in the US, China, and around the globe. US–China Economic and Security Review Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck N, Gordon IR, Hall PG, Harloe M, Kleinman M (2002) Working capital: life and labour in contemporary London. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrell D et al (2005) The emerging global labor market: part II the supply of offshore talent in services. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco. http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/emerginggloballabormarket/part2/MGI_supply_fullreport.pdf Google Scholar
  6. Gordon IR, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud 37:513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon IR, Haslam C, McCann P, Scott-Quinn B (2005) Off-shoring and the City of London. Corporation of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Grote MH, Taube FA (2004) Offshoring the financial services industry: implications for the evolution of Indian IT clusters. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration discussion paper. J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  9. Irving B, Shojal S, Gupta S (2003) Discovering the endgame in the off-shore debate. Capco Inst J Financ Transform 8:103–112Google Scholar
  10. Kynaston D (2001) The City of London: a club no more 1945–2000. Chatto and Windus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Massey D, Meegan R (1982) The anatomy of job loss: the how, why and where of employment decline. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy JC, Ross CF, Schwaber C (2003) Users’ off-shore evolution and its governance impact. Forrester Brief, Forrester Research Inc. http://www.forrester.com
  13. Norwood J et al (2006) Off-shoring: an elusive phenomenon. NAPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Parker A (2004) Two-speed Europe: why one million jobs will move off-shore. IT view research and business trends, Forrester Research. http://www.forrester.com
  15. Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Warf B (1989) Telecommunications and the globalisation of financial services. Prof Geogr 31:257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Willcocks LP, Cullen S, Lacity M (2006) The CEO guide to selecting effective suppliers. The outsourcing enterprise, research paper 3. LogicaCMG, London. http://www.logicacmg.com/uk/350236490
  18. Y/Zen Ltd (2005) The competitive position of London as a global financial centre. Corporation of London, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Gordon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Colin Haslam
    • 2
  • Philip McCann
    • 3
  • Brian Scott-Quinn
    • 4
  1. 1.Geography DepartmentLondon School of EconomicsLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Center for Research in Finance and AccountingUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Economics DepartmentUniversity of Reading, WhiteknightsReadingUnited Kingdom
  4. 4.ISMA Centre, University of Reading, WhiteknightsReadingUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations