Advertisement

Patents, Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe

  • Manfred M FischerEmail author
  • Thomas Scherngell
  • Eva Jansenberger
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

As interest in questions of the knowledge economy has grown, knowledge spillovers have received increased attention in recent years. For the purpose of this paper we use externalities and knowledge spillovers interchangeably to denote the non-pecuniary benefit of knowledge to firms, not responsible for the original investment in the creation of this knowledge. Such spillovers arise when some of the R&D activities have the characteristics of a non-rivalrous good and cannot be appropriated entirely. A fundamental question addressed by empirical research on knowledge spillovers is whether these spillovers are geographically bounded or not (see Karlsson and Manduchi 2001). Most of the studies on this issue thus far have concentrated on the spatial extent of local geographic effects that university research may have on the innovative capacity in a region, both directly and indirectly through its interaction with private sector R&D efforts. The studies vary somewhat in terms of research design, but they all find a strong and positive relationship between innovative activity and both industry R&D and university research at the state level in the USA. But the situation is different in terms of the significance of a local geographic spillover effect. Overall, the evidence is non-existent, weak or mixed, and only pertaining to a few individual sectors (Anselin et al. 1997). This may be due to the fact that knowledge spillovers are measured indirectly rather than directly.

Keywords

Inventive Activity Knowledge Spillover European Patent Patent Citation European Patent Office 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agrawal A, Cockburn IM, McHale J (2003) Gone but not forgotten: labor flows, knowledge spillovers and enduring social capital. NBER Working Paper 9950, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida P (1996) Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Manage J 17:155–65Google Scholar
  3. Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localisation of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manage Sci 45(7):905–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42(3):422–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (1999) Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis, User's Guide. Analytical Technologies HarvardGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer MM (2001) Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. Ann Reg Sci 35(2): 199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Liter 28(4):1661–707Google Scholar
  8. Hicks D, Breitzman T, Olivastro D, Hamilton K (2001) The changing composition of innovative activity in the USA – a portrait based on patent analysis. Res Pol 30(4):681–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaffe AB (2000) The US patent system in transition policy innovation and the innovation process. Res Pol 29(5):531–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (eds) (2002) Patents, citations & innovations. A window on the knowledge economy. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart J Econ 108(3):577–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karlsson C, Manduchi A (2001) Knowledge spillovers in a spatial context – a critical review and assessment. In: Fischer MM, Fröhlich J (eds) Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 101–123Google Scholar
  13. Maurseth PB, Verspagen B (2002) Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citation analysis. Scand J Econ 104(4):531–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Singh J (2003) Multinational firms and international knowledge diffusion: evidence using patent citation data. Working Paper, Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  15. Thompson P (2003) Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: what do patents examiners know? Manuscript, Florida International UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Trajtenberg M (2001) Innovation in Israel 1968–1997: a comparative analysis using patent data. Res Pol 30(3):363–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verspagen B, Van Moergastel T, Slabbers M (1994) MERIT concordance table: IPC–ISIC, rev. 2nd edn. Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, University of Limburg, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  18. Verspagen B, Schoenmakers W (2004) The spatial dimension of patenting by multinational firms in Europe. J Econ Geogr 4(1):23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manfred M Fischer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Scherngell
    • 1
  • Eva Jansenberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Economic Geography & GIScience, Vienna University of Economics and Business AdministrationViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations