Advertisement

Urban–Rural Development in Sweden

  • Johan Klaesson
  • Lars PetterssonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Economic activities are confined to urban metropolitan areas in developed countries. The service sector oriented both towards consumers and producers comprises of a substantial part of the economy and, in general, these sectors are dependent on access to regional purchasing power. Jane Jacobs (1969) stressed the importance of urbanisation as an explanation for economic growth when she argued that the diverse economy in urban regions stimulate innovative activities. Thereby urban diversity is likely to cause productivity to increase and promote economic growth. In Jacobs (1984) seminal book “Cities and the Wealth of Nations” she argued that metropolitan regions and urban economies serve as the backbone and engine of the wealth of nations, not vice versa.

The cause and effects of urbanization have received a great deal of attention within the endogenous growth theory. For e.g., Lucas (1988) recognizes the way metropolitan regions serve as engines for economic growth because of localized information and knowledge spillovers. In models of endogenous growth, accumulation of human capital and knowledge is understood to explain economic growth (Romer 1994). This means that the regional market size by itself, and hence, the process of urbanization influences the growth of the economy. Growth and urbanization are analyzed in models where workers’ and households’ are allowed to migrate between regions. The seminal core-periphery model attributed to Krugman (1991) represents a type of model that is widely referred to within this field of study that allows us to consider both rural and urbanized regions in one model. As pointed out by Fujita and Thisse (2002), since the “new” theories of growth and “new economic geography” rest on the same modeling framework of monopolistic competition, there is a solid foundation of cross-fertilisation between the two fields of study.

Keywords

Rural Area Urbanized Region Metropolitan Region Agglomeration Economy Urban Core 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boarnet MG (1994) An empirical model of intrametropolitan population and employment growth. Pap Reg Sci 73:135–153Google Scholar
  2. Capello R, Faggiani A (2002) An economic-ecological model of urban growth and urban externalities: empirical evidence from Italy. Ecol Econ 40:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlino G, Mills ES (1987) The determinants of county growth. J Reg Sci 27:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deitz R (1998) A joint model of residential and employment location in urban areas. J Urban Econ 44:197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes DW, Holland DW (1994) Core-periphery economic linkage: a measure of spread and possible backwash effects for the Washington economy. Land Econ 70(3):364–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs J (1984) Cities and the wealth of nations. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmitt B, Henry MS (2000) Size and growth of urban centers in French labor market areas: consequences for rural population and employment. Reg Sci Urban Econ 30(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Statistics Sweden (2005) Localities 2005, MI 38 SM 0601, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  14. Vermeulen W, Van Ommeren J (2004) Interaction of regional population and employment: identifying short-run equilibrium adjustment effects. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2004 – 083/3, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Voith R (1998) Do cities need suburbs? J Reg Sci 38:445–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Westlund H (2002) An unplanned green wave: settlement patterns in Sweden during the 1990s. Environ Plan A 34(8):1395–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.The Swedish Board of Agriculture, JönköpingJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations