Skip to main content

Learning by Erasing in Dynamic Epistemic Logic

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5457))

Abstract

This work provides a comparison of learning by erasing [1] and iterated epistemic update [2] as analyzed in dynamic epistemic logic (see e.g.[3]). We show that finite identification can be modelled in dynamic epistemic logic and that the elimination process of learning by erasing can be seen as iterated belief-revision modelled in dynamic doxastic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lange, S., Wiehagen, R., Zeugmann, T.: Learning by erasing. In: Arikawa, S., Sharma, A.K. (eds.) ALT 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1160, pp. 228–241. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Moss, L.: Logics for epistemic programs. Synthese 139(2), 165–224 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain, S., Osherson, D., Royer, J.S., Sharma, A.: Systems that Learn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gold, E.: Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10, 447–474 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiede, H.J.: Identifiability in the limit of context-free generalized quantifiers. Journal of Language and Computation 1, 93–102 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costa Florêntio, C.: Learning generalized quantifiers. In: Proc. 7th ESSLLI Student Session (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gierasimczuk, N.: The problem of learning the semantics of quantifiers. In: ten Cate, B.D., Zeevat, H.W. (eds.) TbiLLC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4363, pp. 117–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly, K.: The Logic of Reliable Inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Osherson, D., de Jongh, D., Martin, E., Weinstein, S.: Formal learning theory. In: van Benthem, J., Ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 737–775. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, E., Osherson, D.: Elements of Scientific Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell University Press (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Freivalds, R., Zeugmann, T.: Co–learning of recursive languages from positive data. In: Bjorner, D., Broy, M., Pottosin, I.V. (eds.) PSI 1996. LNCS, vol. 1181, pp. 122–133. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. van Benthem, J., Gerbrandy, J., Pacuit, E.: Merging frameworks for interaction: DEL and ETL. In: Proc. TARK 2007, pp. 72–81 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Batlag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements and common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Proc. TARK 1998, pp. 43–56 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freivalds, R., Karpinski, M., Smith, C., Wiehagen, R.: Learning by the process of elimination. Information and Computation 176(1), 37–50 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gierasimczuk, N.: Identification through inductive verification. Application to monotone quantifiers. In: Bosch, P., Gabelaia, D., Lang, J. (eds.) TbiLLC 2007. LNCS, vol. 5422, pp. 193–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gierasimczuk, N. (2009). Learning by Erasing in Dynamic Epistemic Logic. In: Dediu, A.H., Ionescu, A.M., Martín-Vide, C. (eds) Language and Automata Theory and Applications. LATA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5457. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00982-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00982-2_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00981-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00982-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics