Skip to main content

Adaptation to climate change in Indonesia - livelihood strategies of rural households in the face of ENSO related droughts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change

Summary

Climate change poses a major threat to the livelihoods of many people, especially those dependent on agriculture. Adaptation to climate change is a necessity to reduce social vulnerability. The adoption of agricultural innovations presents a suitable strategy to reduce negative impacts of increased inter-annual variability in rainfall and temperature. Focussing on the dominant agroforestry system cacao in the Indonesian province of Central Sulawesi, we investigate the adaptation strategies of agricultural smallholders to El Nico-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) related droughts. We apply a triangulation of Rapid Rural Appraisal Methods (RRA), semi-structured in-depth interviews and participatory observations. In addition, results from an intensive cacao-study (n=144) on yields, plot history, structure and location are used.

The analysis shows that all interviewed households have been affected by extreme climatic effects such as ENSO related droughts which lead to a decline in agricultural outputs. Our study identifies various types of adaptation strategies on the micro level. Most common strategies are reactive or ex-post adaptations which support the household in coping with the effects of droughts. Further, the study assesses anticipatory adaptation strategies which, if precisely implemented, alter the household’s exposure to future droughts, increase the resilience to cope with changes and reduce the degree of sensitivity of affected households. On the basis of these results we examine why different household types do not implement certain strategies, which could enhance their social resilience. In this context we reveal that the adoption of anticipatory adaptation strategies is strongly influenced by social and human capital. The knowledge transfer - which promotes adaptation - is mainly taking place along ethnic lines and local institutions. For the successful adoption of innovations to cope with ENSO related droughts in the study area, membership in certain ethnic groups, local institutions and networks is of utmost importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 717–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change 15: 77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (1999) Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam. World Development 27: 249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala S, Broad K (2002) Technology transfer perspectives on climate forecast applications. Research in Science and Technology Studies 13: 45–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkmann J, Burkhard G, Faust H, Fremerey M, Koch S, Lanini A (2010) Land tenure rights, village institutions, and rainforest conversion in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia). In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Veldkamp E, Faust H, Guhardja E, Bidin A (eds.) Tropical rainforests and agroforests under global change: Ecological and socio-economic valuations. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont P, Walker R (1994) Land degradation and property regimes. Ecological Economics 18 (1): 55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle HG, Glade T. (2008) Vulnerabilitätskonzepte in Sozial- und Naturwissenschaften. In: Felgentreff C, Glade T (Eds.) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen, Berlin, p. 99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane MA, Zebiak SE, Dolan SC (1986) Experimental Forecasts of El Niño. Nature, 321: 827–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. (1989) Editorial Introduction: Vulnerability, Coping and Policy. IDS Bulletin 20 (2): 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Conway G (1991) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies Discussion Papers 296, 1991. University of Sussex, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz RV, Harasawa H, Lal M, Wu S, Anokhin Y, Punsalmaa B, Honda Y, Jafari M, Li C, Huu Ninh N (2007) Asia. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 469–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan WM (1983) Adaptation, variation and cultural geography. Professional Geographer 35: 399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID (1999) Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets, Numbers 1-8, London, Department for International Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmi S, Pries J (2007) Satellite and survey data: a multiple source approach to study regional land-cover / land-use change in Indonesia. In: Dickmann F (Ed.) Geovisualisierung in der Humangeographie. Kartographische Schriften 13: 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmi S, Twele A, Ardiansyah M, Malik A, Kappas M (2004) Mapping Deforestation and Land Cover Conversion at the Rainforest Margin in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. EARSeL eProceedings 3: 388–397

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization (2008) Special Programme for Food Security. URL:http://database.deptan.go.id/saims-indonesia/index.php?files=introduction (27/12/2008)

  • Faust H, Maertens M, Weber R, Nuryartono N, Van Rheenen T, Birner R (2003) Does Migration lead to Destabilization of Forest Margins? Evidence from an interdisciplinary field study in Central Sulawesi. STORMA Discussion Paper Series No.11, Göttingen and Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz MH (2001): Once Burned, Twice Shy? Lessons Learned from the 1997-98 El Niño. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gockowski J, Nkamleu GB, Wendt J (2001) Implications of resource-use intensification for the environment and sustainable technology systems in the central african rainforest. In: Lee DR, Barrett CB (Eds.) Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment, CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill A, Leclerc L, Myatt-Hirvonen O, Salinas Z (2005) Using the sustainable livelihoods approach to reduce vulnerability to climate change. In: Robledo C, Kanninen M, Pedroni L (Eds.) Tropical forests and adaptation to climate change, Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Watson RT and the Core Writing Team (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000) Land-use, land-use change and forestry. Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil A, Teufel N, Gunawan D, Leemhuis C (2009) Vulnerability of smallholder farmers to ENSO-related drought in Indonesia. Climate Research 38 (2): 155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil A, Zeller M, Wida A, Sanim B, Birner R (2008) What determines farmers’ resilience towards ENSO-related drought? An empirical assessment in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Climatic Change 86: 291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil A (2004) The socio-economic impact of ENSO-related drought on farm households in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Shaker, Aachen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly PM, Adger WN, (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climate Change 47: 325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch S, Faust H, Barkmann J (2008): Differences in power structures regarding access to natural resources at the village level in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia). Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 1 (2): 59–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2002) Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners, London

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA - National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (2008) Multivariate ENSO Index. URL: http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/people/klaus.wolter/MEI/rank.html (26/12/2008)

  • Pfaff A, Broad K, Glantz M (1999) Who benefits from climate forecasts? Nature, 397, 645–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf F, Eheret P, Yoddang J (1996) Smallholder Cocoa in Indonesia: Why a Cocoa Boom in Sulawesi? In: Clarence-Smith W (Eds.) Cocoa Pioneer Fronts since 1800 - The Role of Smallholders, Planters and Merchants. MacMillan, London, p. 212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Weber R, Faust H (2007) Agricultural Household Types in Upland Sulawesi, Indonesia - A Classification Approach. STORMA Discussion Paper Series No.21, Göttingen and Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72, IDS, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (Eds.) Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Toni F, Holanda JrE (2008) The effects of land tenure on vulnerability to droughts in Northeastern Brazil. Global Environmental Change 18: 575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8074–8079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verchot LV, van Nordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich T, Ong C, Albrecht A, Mackensen J, Bantilan C, Anupama KV, Palm C (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12: 901–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (2006) Kulturlandschaftswandel in Zentralsulawesi: Historisch-geographische Analyse einer indonesischen Bergregenwaldregion. Göttingen, Universit ätsverlag Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber R, Faust H (2006) Kulturelle Aspekte der Landnutzung in Indonesien. Geographica Helvetica 61: 237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA, Glantz MH (1985) Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of definitions. Water International 10: 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witzel A (1989) Das problemzentrierte Interview. In: Jüttemann G (Ed.) Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. Grundfragen, Verfahrensweisen, Anwendungsfelder. Asanger, Heidelberg, p. 227–256

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ISDR (International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2004): Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives, UN Publications, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Strzepek K, Pau T, Yohe C (2003) Assessing Vulnerability in the context of changing socioeconomic conditions: a study of Egypt. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (Eds.) Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller M, Schwarze S, and van Rheenen T (2002) Statistical Sampling Frame and Methods Used for the Selection of Villages and Households in the Scope of the Research Programme on Stability of Rainforest Margins in Indonesia. STORMA Discussion Paper Series No 1. Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert B. Binternagel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Binternagel, N.B. et al. (2010). Adaptation to climate change in Indonesia - livelihood strategies of rural households in the face of ENSO related droughts. In: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, C., Veldkamp, E., Faust, H., Guhardja, E., Bidin, A. (eds) Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00493-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics