Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 55))

Abstract

In order to ensure simulations reproducibility, particular attention must be payed to the specification of its model. This requires adequate design methodologies, that enlightens modelers on possible implementation ambiguities – and biases – their model might have. Yet, because of not adapted knowledge representation, current reactive simulation design methodologies lack specifications concerning interaction selection, especially in stochastic behaviors. Thanks to the interaction-oriented methodology IODA – which knowledge representation is fit to handle such problems – this paper provides simple guidelines to describe interaction selection. These guidelines use a subsumption like-structure, and focus the design of interaction selection on two points : how the selection takes place – for instance first select the interaction, and then select the partner of the interaction, or first a partner and then an interaction – and the nature of each selection – for instance at random, or with a utility function. This provides a valuable communication support between modelers and computer scientists, that makes the interpretation of the model and its implementation clearer, and the identification of ambiguities and biases easier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernon, C., Camps, V., Gleizes, M.-P., Picard, G.: Engineering Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems: The ADELFE Methodology. In: Agent-Oriented Methodologies (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briot, J.-P., Meurisse, T.: An experience in using components to construct and compose agent behaviors for agent-based simulation. In: Proceedings of IMSM 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R.A.: A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE journal of robotics and automation 2(1) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demazeau, Y.: From interactions to collective behaviour in agent-based systems. In: Proceedings of ECCS 1995, Saint-Malo, France (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein, J., Axtell, R.: Growing Artificial Societies. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Reactive reasoning and planning. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1987, Seattle, WA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kubera, Y., Mathieu, P., Picault, S.: Biases in multi-agent based simulations : An experimental study. In: Proceedings of ESAW 2008, St Etienne, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kubera, Y., Mathieu, P., Picault, S.: Interaction-oriented agent simulations : From theory to implementation. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2008, Patras Greece (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kubera, Y., Mathieu, P., Picault, S.: Interaction selection ambiguities in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of IAT 2008, Sydney, Australia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michaelis, L., Menten, M.L.: Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochemische Zeitschrift 49 (1913)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Müller, J.P., Pischel, M.: Modelling interacting agents in dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of ECAI 1994, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson, N.J.: Teleo-reactive programs for agent control. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ricordel, P.-M., Demazeau, Y.: Volcano, a vowels-oriented multi-agent platform. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Nawarecki, E. (eds.) CEEMAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2296, p. 253. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. van Langevelde, I., Philipsen, A., Treur, J.: Formal specification of compositional architectures. In: Proceedings of ECAI 1992 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weyns, D., Parunak, H., Michel, F., Holvoet, T., Ferber, J.: Environments for multiagent systems: State-of-the-art and research challenges. In: Environments for multiagent systems, New York, NY, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilensky, U.: Netlogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1999), http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kubera, Y., Mathieu, P., Picault, S. (2009). How to Avoid Biases in Reactive Simulations. In: Demazeau, Y., Pavón, J., Corchado, J.M., Bajo, J. (eds) 7th International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAMS 2009). Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 55. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00487-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00487-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00486-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00487-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics