Skip to main content

Formalising Situatedness and Adaptation in Electronic Institutions

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV (COIN 2008)

Abstract

Similarly to institutions in human societies, an Electronic Institution (EI) provides a structured framework for a Multi-Agent System (MAS) to regulate agents’ interactions. However, current EIs cannot regulate a previously existing dynamic social system and deal with its agent population behaviour changes. This paper suggests a solution consisting of two EI extensions to incorporate situatedness and adaptation to the institution. These two properties are usually present at an agent level, but this paper studies how to bring them to an organisational level. While exposing our approach, we use a traffic scenario example to illustrate its concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lewis, D.: Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esteva, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. IIIA PhD Monography. vol. 19 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boissier, O., Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S.: Organization oriented programming: From closed to open organizations. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS, vol. 4457, pp. 86–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez-Sanz, J., Gervais, M.P., Weiß, G.: A survey of agent-oriented software engineering research. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., Michel, F.: From agents to organizations: An organizational view of multi-agent systems. In: Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J.J. (eds.) AOSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2935, pp. 214–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Arcos, J.L., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: E4MAS through Electronic Institutions. In: Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4389, pp. 184–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Self-adaptation in autonomic electronic institutions through case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of MA4CS Workshop of ECCS 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sierra, C., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Noriega, P., Esteva, M., Arcos, J.L.: Personal communications about Electronic Institutions (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gaertner, D., García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.-A., Vasconcelos, W.: Distributed norm management in regulated mas. In: AAMAS 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. García-Camino, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C., Vasconcelos, W.: A rule-based approach to norm-oriented programming of electronic institutions. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 5(5), 33–40 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Norm adaptation of autonomic electronic institutions with multiple goals. ITSSA 1(3), 227–238 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boissier, O., Gâteau, B.: Normative multi-agent organizations: Modeling, support and control, draft version. In: Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.) Normative Multi-agent Systems. Number 07122 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Dagstuhl, Germany, Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weyns, D., Holvoet, T.: A formal model for situated multi-agent systems. Fundam. Inform. 63(2-3), 125–158 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferber, J., Muller, J.P.: Influences and reaction: A model of situated multiagent systems. In: Lesser, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi–Agent Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ricci, A., Viroli, M., Omicini, A.: CArtA gO: A framework for prototyping artifact-based environments in MAS. In: Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4389, pp. 67–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Saunier, J., Balbo, F., Badeig, F.: Environment as active support of interaction. In: Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4389, pp. 87–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Valckenaers, P., Sauter, J.A., Sierra, C., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Applications and environments for multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(1), 61–85 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cardoso, H.L., Oliveira, E., Pesquisa, N.: A Context-based Institutional Normative Environment. In: Hubner, J.F., et al. (eds.) COIN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5428, pp. 140–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gaertner, D., Toni, F., Aguilar, J.A.R.: Agreeing on institutional goals for multi-agent societies. In: Hubner, J.F., et al. (eds.) COIN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5428, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sen, S., Airiau, S.: Emergence of norms through social learning. In: Veloso, M.M. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 1507–1512 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. López-López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: AAMAS, pp. 674–681. ACM, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Vecht, B., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J., Dignum, V.: Organizations and autonomous agents: Bottom-up dynamics of coordination mechanisms. In: Hubner, J.F. (ed.) COIN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5428, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silva, V., Traba, R.H., Centeno, R.: A hybrid reputation model based on the use of organizations. In: Hubner, J.F., et al. (eds.) COIN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5428. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez, I., Salamo, M., Lopez-Sanchez, M., Cerquides, J., Puig, A., Sierra, C.: Completing the virtual analogy of real institutions via iobjects. In: Congrés Internacional de l’Associació Catalana d’Intelligéncia Artificial (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Campos, J., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Esteva, M. (2009). Formalising Situatedness and Adaptation in Electronic Institutions. In: Hübner, J.F., Matson, E., Boissier, O., Dignum, V. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV . COIN 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00442-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00443-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics