Skip to main content

Organizations and Autonomous Agents: Bottom-Up Dynamics of Coordination Mechanisms

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV (COIN 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5428))

Abstract

Agents in an organization need to coordinate their actions in order to reach the organizational goals. Organizational models specify the desired behaviour in terms of roles, relations, norms and interactions. In this research, we show how organizational rules can be adopted by autonomous agents. We have developed a method to translate norms into reasoning rules for agents. However, since the agents are autonomous they will have their own reasoning rules next to the organizational rules. We propose a modular reasoning model to make organizational rules explicit. This allows for meta-reasoning about these rules. We show that this stimulates bottom-up dynamics in the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. Utrecht University, PhD Thesis (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In: ICMAS 1998: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, p. 128. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. In: SBIA, pp. 118–128 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jennings, N.R.: On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence 117(2), 277–296 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Matson, E., DeLoach, S.: Formal transition in agent organizations. In: IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Intensive Multiagent Systems (KIMAS 2005), pp. 235–240 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dignum, V., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.J.C.: An agent-mediated approach to the support of knowledge sharing in organizations. Knowledge Engineering Review 19(2), 147–174 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Vecht, B., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.J.C., Neef, M.: A dynamic coordination mechanism using adjustable autonomy. In: Sichman, J.S., Padget, J., Ossowski, S., Noriega, P. (eds.) COIN 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4870, pp. 83–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, B., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.J.C.: A programming language for cognitive agents: Goal directed 3apl. In: Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah-Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 3067, pp. 111–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao, A.S.: Agentspeak(l): Bdi agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Brewka, G.: Reasoning about priorities in default logic. In: AAAI 1994: Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 940–945. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kakas, A., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: Modular representation of agent interaction rules through argumentation. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11(2), 189–206 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Oren, N., Luck, M., Miles, S., Norman, T.J.: An argumentation inspired heuristic for resolving normative conflict. In: Hubner, J.F., et al. (eds.) COIN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5428. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sichman, J., Conte, R.: On personal and role mental attitude: A preliminary dependency-based analysis. In: de Oliveira, F.M. (ed.) SBIA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1515, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Role assignment in open agent societies. In: AAMAS 2003, pp. 489–496. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Vecht, B., Dignum, F., Meyer, JJ.C., Dignum, V. (2009). Organizations and Autonomous Agents: Bottom-Up Dynamics of Coordination Mechanisms. In: Hübner, J.F., Matson, E., Boissier, O., Dignum, V. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV . COIN 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00442-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00443-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics