Skip to main content

The Value of Weights in Automatically Generated Text Structures

  • Conference paper
  • 1774 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5449))

Abstract

One question that arises if we want to evolve generation techniques to accommodate Web ontologies is how to capture and expose the relevant ontology content to the user. This paper presents an attempt to answer the question about how to select the ontology statements that are significant for the user and present those statements in a way that helps the user to learn. Our generation approach combines bottom-up and top-down techniques with enhanced comparison methods to tailor descriptions about a concept described in an ontology. A preliminary evaluation indicates that the process of computing preferable property weights in addition to enhanced generation methods has a positive effect on the text structure and its content. Future work aims to assign grammar rules and lexical entries in order to produce coherent texts that follow on from the generated text structures in several languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, I., Kokkinaki, V., Dimitromanolaki, A., Calder, J., Oberl, J., Not, E.: Generating multilingual personalized descriptions of museum exhibits: the m-piro project. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berners-lee, T.: Semantic Web Road Map. W3C Design Issues (October 1998), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html

  3. Bontcheva, K.: Generating tailored textual summaries from ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 531–545. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bontcheva, K., Wilks, Y.: Automatic report generation from ontologies: The MIAKT approach. In: Meziane, F., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3136, pp. 324–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouayad-Agha, N., Power, R., Scott, D.: Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure? In: Proceedings of First International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG), pp. 194–200 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Capra, R., Marchionini, G., Oh, J.S., Stutzman, F., Zhang, Y.: Effects of structure and interaction style on distinct search tasks. In: JCDL 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Digital libraries, pp. 442–451. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Clough, P., Marlow, J., Ireson, N.: Enabling semantic access to cultural heritage: A case study of tate online. In: Proceedings of the ECDL. Workshop on Information Access to Cultural Heritage, Aarhus, Denmark (2008) ISBN 978-90-813489-1-1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dale, R., Reiter, E.: Computational interpretations of the gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science 19, 233–263 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dannélls, D.: A system architecture for conveying historical knowledge to museum visitors. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference On Research And Advanced Technology For Digital Libraries (ECDL) Workshop on Information Access to Cultural Heritage, Aarhus, Denmark (2008) ISBN 978-90-813489-1-1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doerr, M., Ore, C.E., Stead, S.: The cidoc conceptual reference model: a new standard for knowledge sharing. In: ER 2007: Tutorials, posters, panels and industrial contributions at the 26th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hardcastle, D., Scott, D.: Can we evaluate the quality of generated text? In: The 6th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Morocco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isard, A.: Choosing the best comparison under the circumstances. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalization Enhanced Access to Cultural Heritage (PATCH 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson, P., Degerstedt, L., Jönsson, A.: Iterative development of an information-providing dialogue system. In: Proceedings of 7th European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM) Workshop (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mellish, C., Knott, A., Oberlander, J.: Experiments using stochastic search for text planning. In: International Conference on Natural Language Generation (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mellish, C., Oberlander, J., Knott, A.: An architecture for opportunistic text generation. In: The Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mellish, C., Pan, J.Z.: Natural language directed inference from ontologies. Artificial Intelligence 172, 1285–1315 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Milosavljevic, M.: Content selection in comparison generation. In: The 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (6th EWNLG) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Donnell, M.J., Mellish, C., Oberlander, J., Knott, A.: ILex: An architecture for a dynamic hypertext generation system. Natural Language Engineering 7, 225–250 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reiter, E.: Has a consensus NLG architecture appeared and is it psycholinguistically plausible? In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Kennebunkport, Maine, pp. 163–170 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building Natural Language Generation Systems. MIT Press and The McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc., Singapore (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilcock, G.: Talking owls: Towards an ontology verbalizer. In: Human Language Technology for the Semantic Web and Web Services, Sanibel Island, Florida, pp. 109–112 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilcock, G., Jokinen, K.: Generating responses and explanations from rdf/xml and daml+oil. In: Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems IJCAI, Acapulco, pp. 58–63 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young, M.R.: Using grice’s maxim of quantity to select the content of plan descriptions. Artificial Intelligence 115, 215–256 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dannélls, D. (2009). The Value of Weights in Automatically Generated Text Structures. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5449. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00382-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00382-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00381-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00382-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics