Skip to main content

Translating BPMN Models into UML Activities

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 17))

Abstract

In business-driven development, IT architects must face the challenge of building IT solutions that are aligned with business processes in order to satisfy business requirements. To this endeavor, they must understand those business processes, which requires extensive collaboration with domain experts and analysts. Because business processes are typically expressed using dedicated modeling notations - e.g. BPMN - IT architects are forced to master their particularities. In order to support IT architects in performing the business-IT alignment, an approach for the automatic translation from BPMN models to UML activity models is proposed. By means of re-expressing business processes in a language that is closer to the architecture, the synchronization of the process models with other UML architectural models is enabled. In addition, architects are relieved from having to master BPMN. This paper reports on the challenges of defining and implementing such a translation. ATL is used as the model transformation language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Havey M.: What Is Business Process Modeling (2005), http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/07/20/businessprocessmodeling.html

  2. OMG, Business Process Modeling Notation Specification v1.0. OMG Final Adopted Specification (February 2006), http://www.bpmn.org/

  3. Mitra T.: Business-Driven Development. IBM DeveloperWorks (2005), http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-bdd/

  4. OMG, http://www.omg.org/mda/

  5. BPMI.org, Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Information, FAQs (2004), http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/FAQ.htm

  6. OMG, Unified Modeling Language (UML), Version 2.1.2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eclipse, SOA Tools Platform Project, BPMN Modeller, http://www.eclipse.org/stp/bpmn/

  8. ATLAS Group (INRIA & LINA), ATLAS Transformation Language, http://www.eclipse.org/m2m/atl/

  9. OASIS, Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Mendling, J.: From Business Process Models to Process-Oriented Software Systems. In: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology (to appear); Preliminary version, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00005266/01/5266.pdf

  11. Dubray J.: The Seven Fallacies of Business Process Execution. Article at InfoQ (2007), http://www.infoq.com/articles/seven-fallacies-of-bpm

  12. White S.: Process Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns. IBM (2004), http://www.bpmn.org/

  13. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Russell, N.: On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 161–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, N., van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Wohed, P.: On the Suitability of UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams for Business Process Modeling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific conference on Conceptual Modeling. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Russell, N.: Pattern-based Analysis of UML Activity Diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murzek, M., Kramler, G.: Business Process Model Transformation Issues - The Top 7 Adversaries Encountered at Defining Model Transformations. In: ICEIS, vol. 3, pp. 144–151 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Redding, G., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Iordachescu, A.: Transforming Object-Oriented Models to Process-Oriented Models. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 132–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cibrán, M.A. (2009). Translating BPMN Models into UML Activities. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00328-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics