Abstract
In the context of business process intelligence, along with the need to extract a process model from a log, there is also the need to measure the quality of the extracted process model. Hence, process model quality notions and metrics are required. We present a systematic approach for developing quality metrics for block structured process models, which offer less expressive power than Petri-nets but have easier semantics. The metrics are based on tagging an initial block structured process model with self-loop and optional markings in order to explain all the instances in the given log. Then we transform the marked model to an equivalent maximal model by rewriting the self-loop and optional markings for consistency, and determine a badness score for it, which determines quality. Our approach is compared with related work, and a plan for testing and validation on noise-free and noisy data is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., Günther, C.W., Mans, R.S., Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Rozinat, A., Rubin, V., Song, M., Weijters, A.J.M.M., Verbeek, H.M.W.: ProM 4.0: Comprehensive support for real process analysis. In: Kleijn, J., Yakovlev, A. (eds.) ICATPN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4546, pp. 484–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 14(2), 245–304 (2007)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., Herbst, J., Maruster, L., Schimm, G., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Workflow mining: A survey of issues and approaches. Data and Knowledge Engineering 47(2), 237–267 (2003)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.J.M.M., Maruster, L.: Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(9), 1128–1142 (2004)
Huang, Z., Kumar, A.: A study of process mining: Quality and accuracy trade-offs. Smeal Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University (September 2008)
Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Information Systems 33(1), 64–95 (2008)
Rozinat, A., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Günther, C.W., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The need for a process mining evaluation framework in research and practice. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Business Process Intelligence, pp. 84–89 (2007)
Schimm, G.: Mining most specific workflow models from event-based data. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 25–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, Z., Kumar, A. (2009). New Quality Metrics for Evaluating Process Models. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00327-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00328-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)