Skip to main content

Checking Compliance of Execution Traces to Business Rules

  • Conference paper
Book cover Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2008)

Abstract

Complex and flexible business processes are critical not only because they are difficult to handle, but also because they often tend to loose their intelligibility. Verifying compliance of complex and flexible processes becomes therefore a fundamental requirement. We propose a framework for performing compliance checking of process execution traces w.r.t. expressive reactive business rules, tailored to the MXML meta-model. Rules are mapped to Logic Programming, using Prolog to classify execution traces as compliant/non-compliant. We show how different rule templates, inspired by the ConDec language, can be easily specified and then customized in the context of a real industrial case study. We finally describe how the proposed language and its underlying a-posteriori reasoning technique have been concretely implemented as a ProM analysis plug-in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pesic, M., Schonenberg, M.H., Sidorova, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Constraint-based workflow models: Change made easy. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 77–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber, B., Rinderle, S., Reichert, M.: Change patterns and change support features in process-aware information systems. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 574–588. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Reichert, M., Rinderle, S., Kreher, U., Dadam, P.: Adaptive process management with ADEPT2. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2005), pp. 1113–1114. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Aalst, W., de Beer, H., van Dongen, B.: Process Mining and Verification of Properties: An Approach based on Temporal Logic. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 130–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., Günther, C.W., Mans, R.S., de Medeiros, A.A., Rozinat, A., Rubin, V., Song, M., Verbeek, H.M.W., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: ProM 4.0: Comprehensive Support for Real Process Analysis. In: Kleijn, J., Yakovlev, A. (eds.) ICATPN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4546, pp. 484–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Meta Model for Process Mining Data. In: Casto, J., Teniente, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the CAiSE 2005 Workshops (EMOI-INTEROP Workshop), FEUP, Porto, Portugal, vol. 2, pp. 309–320 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alberti, M., Chesani, F., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Verifiable agent interaction in abductive logic programming: the SCIFF framework. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 9(4) (to appear) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pissinou, N., Snodgrass, R.T., Elmasri, R., Mumick, I.S., Özsu, T., Pernici, B., Segev, A., Theodoulidis, B., Dayal, U.: Towards an infrastructure for temporal databases. SIGMOD Rec 23(1), 35–51 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadiq, S.W., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamma, E., Mello, P., Montali, M., Riguzzi, F., Storari, S.: Inducing declarative logic-based models from labeled traces. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 344–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Luccarini, L., Bragadin, G.L., Mancini, M., Mello, P., Montali, M., Sottara, D.: Process quality assessment in automatic management of wastewater treatment plants using formal verification. In: Proceedings of Simposio Internazionale di Ingegneria Sanitaria Ambientale (SIDISA 2008) (to appear) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Riguzzi, F., Sebastianis, M., Storari, S. (2009). Checking Compliance of Execution Traces to Business Rules. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00328-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics