Skip to main content

Argumentation- vs. Proposal-Based Negotiation: An Empirical Case Study on the Basis of Game-Theoretic Solution Concepts

  • Conference paper
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5384))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentation-based negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for complex multiagent negotiation. In this paper, we present an empirical comparison of argumentation-based negotiation to proposal-based negotiation in a strategic two-player scenario. We apply a game-theoretic solution as a benchmark, which requires full knowledge of the stage games. Our experiments show that in fact the argumentation-based approach outperforms the proposal-based approach with respect to the quality of the agreements found and the overall time to agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds.): The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2, pp. 460–482. Macmillan, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jennings, N.R., Parsons, S., Noriega, P., Sierra, C.: On argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, Boston, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kraus, S.: Automated negotiation and decision making in multiagent environments. In: Luck, M., Mařík, V., Štěpánková, O., Trappl, R. (eds.) ACAI 2001 and EASSS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2086, pp. 150–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Lomuscio, A., Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R.: A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce. In: Sierra, C., Dignum, F.P.M. (eds.) AgentLink 2000. LNCS, vol. 1991, p. 19. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I.: Argumentation in multi-agent systems: Context and recent developments. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4766, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Murray, C., Gordon, G.: Multi-robot negotiation: Approximating the set of subgame perfect equilibria in general sum stochastic games. In: Schölkopf, B., Platt, J., Hoffman, T. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 19. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nash, J.F.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2), 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S., Jennings, N., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rahwan, I., Sonenberg, L., McBurney, P.: Bargaining and argument-based negotiation: Some preliminary comparisons. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education, London (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandholm, T.W.: Distributed rational decision making. In: Weiß, G. (ed.) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 201–258. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, X., Sandholm, T.: Reinforcement learning to play an optimal nash equilibrium in team markov games. In: Becker, S.T.S., Obermayer, K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 15, pp. 1571–1578. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weiß, G. (ed.): Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Först, A., Rettinger, A., Nickles, M. (2009). Argumentation- vs. Proposal-Based Negotiation: An Empirical Case Study on the Basis of Game-Theoretic Solution Concepts. In: Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5384. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00206-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00207-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics