Skip to main content

On Compositionality, Efficiency, and Applicability of Abstraction in Probabilistic Systems

  • Conference paper
SOFSEM 2009: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5404))

Abstract

A branching bisimulation for probabilistic systems that is preserved under parallel composition has been defined recently for the alternating model. We show that besides being compositional, it is decidable in polynomial time and it preserves the properties expressible in probabilistic Computation Tree Logic (pCTL). In the ground-complete axiomatization, only a single axiom is added to the axioms for strong bisimulation. We show that the Concurrent Alternating Bit protocol can be verified using the process algebra and a set of recursive rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aceto, L., Ésik, Z., Ingólfsdóttir, A.: Equational axioms for probabilistic bisimilarity. In: Kirchner, H., Ringeissen, C. (eds.) AMAST 2002. LNCS, vol. 2422, pp. 239–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Andova, S., Baeten, J.C.M., D’Argenio, P.R., Willemse, T.A.C.: A compositional merge of probabilistic processes in the alternating model. In: NWPT 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andova, S., Baeten, J.C.M., Willemse, T.A.C.: A complete axiomatisation of branching bisimulation for probabilistic systems with an application in protocol verification. In: Baier, C., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CONCUR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4137, pp. 327–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Andova, S., Georgievska, S., Trčka, N.: On compositionality, efficiency, and applicability of abstraction in probabilistic systems (2008), http://www.win.tue.nl/~sgeorgie/processalgebra.pdf

  5. Andova, S., Willemse, T.A.C.: Branching bisimulation for probabilistic systems: characteristics and decidability. Theor. Comput. Sci. 356(3), 325–355 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Baeten, J.C.M., Bravetti, M.: A ground-complete axiomatization of finite state processes in process algebra. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 248–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Baeten, J.C.M., Weijland, W.P.: Process Algebra. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Baier, C., Katoen, J.-P., Hermanns, H., Wolf, V.: Comparative branching-time semantics for Markov chains. Inf. Comput. 200(2), 149–214 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Baier, C., Kwiatkowska, M.: Model checking for a probabilistic branching time logic with fairness. Distrib. Comput. 11(3), 125–155 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bandini, E., Segala, R.: Axiomatizations for probabilistic bisimulation. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 370–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bianco, A., de Alfaro, L.: Model checking of probabalistic and nondeterministic systems. In: Thiagarajan, P.S. (ed.) FSTTCS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1026, pp. 499–513. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cattani, S., Segala, R.: Decision algorithms for probabilistic bisimulation. In: Brim, L., Jančar, P., Křetínský, M., Kucera, A. (eds.) CONCUR 2002. LNCS, vol. 2421, pp. 371–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. De Nicola, R., Vaandrager, F.W.: Three logics for branching bisimulation. JACM 42(2), 458–487 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Deng, Y., Palamidessi, C., Pang, J.: Compositional reasoning for probabilistic finite-state behaviors. In: Middeldorp, A., van Oostrom, V., van Raamsdonk, F., de Vrijer, R. (eds.) Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity. LNCS, vol. 3838, pp. 309–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Desharnais, J., Gupta, V., Jagadeesan, R., Panangaden, P.: Weak bisimulation is sound and complete for PCTL*. In: Brim, L., Jančar, P., Křetínský, M., Kucera, A. (eds.) CONCUR 2002. LNCS, vol. 2421, pp. 355–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. van Glabbeek, R.J., Weijland, P.: Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics. JACM 43(3), 555–600 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Groote, J.F., Vaandrager, F.: An efficient algorithm for branching bisimulation and stuttering equivalence. In: Paterson, M. (ed.) ICALP 1990. LNCS, vol. 443, pp. 626–638. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansson, H.A.: Time and Probability in Formal Design of Distributed Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mislove, M.W., Ouaknine, J., Worrell, J.: Axioms for probability and nondeterminism. ENTCS 96, 7–28 (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan, C., McIver, A., Seidel, K., Sanders, J.W.: Refinement-oriented probability for CSP. Formal Aspects of Computing 8(6), 617–647 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Philippou, A., Lee, I., Sokolsky, O.: Weak bisimulation for probabilistic systems. In: Palamidessi, C. (ed.) CONCUR 2000. LNCS, vol. 1877, pp. 334–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Segala, R., Lynch, N.: Probabilistic simulations for probabilistic processes. Nordic J. of Computing 2(2), 250–273 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Segala, R., Turrini, A.: Comparative analysis of bisimulation relations on alternating and non-alternating probabilistic models. In: QEST 2005, pp. 44–53. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sokolova, A., de Vink, E.P.: Probabilistic automata: system types, parallel composition and comparison. In: Baier, C., Haverkort, B.R., Hermanns, H., Katoen, J.-P., Siegle, M. (eds.) Validation of Stochastic Systems. LNCS, vol. 2925, pp. 1–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Trčka, N., Georgievska, S.: Branching bisimulation congruence for probabilistic systems. In: QAPL 2008, ENTCS (to appear, 2008), http://www.win.tue.nl/~sgeorgie/TG08report.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andova, S., Georgievska, S. (2009). On Compositionality, Efficiency, and Applicability of Abstraction in Probabilistic Systems. In: Nielsen, M., Kučera, A., Miltersen, P.B., Palamidessi, C., Tůma, P., Valencia, F. (eds) SOFSEM 2009: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95891-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95891-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-95890-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-95891-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics