Skip to main content

Testing of Alternate Classification Procedures Within an Operational, Satellite Based, Forest Monitoring System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovations in Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry

Abstract

In Australia, continental mapping and monitoring of the extent and change in perennial vegetation using Landsat satellite imagery is routinely performed as part of the National Carbon Accounting System - Land Cover Change Project (NCAS-LCCP). Since its original inception, the methods within the operational LCCP system have been progressively developed by the CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences division in collaboration with the Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO). Under a framework of contracts and Quality Assurance (QA) procedures, commercial companies apply these methods to the growing archive of Landsat images to produce time-series continental coverages of the presence and absence of perennial vegetation cover at a pixel resolution of 25 m. The raw data archive currently consists of approximately 5000 Landsat images having an approximate data volume of 2 × 1012 bytes (2 terabytes), which is transformed into information products having similar data volumes. Given the above operating environment, accuracy, interpretability (for outsourcing and QA), computational efficiency, the ability to incorporate ‘better’ algorithms, and reliability when applied through space and time, are important aspects for consideration during methodology development. In this paper, we examine the potential benefits and costs associated with using several popular classification techniques within (as subcomponents) the operational classifier. Our key criteria for benefit/cost comparisons are classification accuracy versus computational requirements and interpretability. Our main findings are: that the current operational subcomponent is within 2.5% on average of the benchmark (the classification obtained with the most sophisticated technique used); adopting the benchmark may allow the earlier identification of new plantations, at the expense of an order of magnitude computation; the choice of method for the subcomponent has less effect than choices made elsewhere in the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. and Stone, C. J., 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth Statistics/Probability Series, Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccetta, P. A., 1997. Remote Sensing, GIS and Bayesian Knowledge-Based Methods for Monitoring Land Condition. PhD thesis, School of Computing, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccetta, P. and Bryant, G., 2002. Notes on the Automatic Determination of Index Thresholds for Classification of Perennial Vegetation Change. Technical Report 247, CSIRO Mathematical & Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. and Atchley, W., 1981. The geometry of canonical variate analysis. Systematic Zoology 30(3), 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A., 1983. Generalized linear models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R., 1965. A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Computer Journal 7, 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, 2004. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-00-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D., 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. and Furby, S., 1994. Assessment of change in remnant vegetation area and condition. Technical report, CSIRO Division of Mathematical and Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared O’Connell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Connell, J., Caccetta, P. (2009). Testing of Alternate Classification Procedures Within an Operational, Satellite Based, Forest Monitoring System. In: Jones, S., Reinke, K. (eds) Innovations in Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93962-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics