Skip to main content

Specifying and Enforcing Norms in Artificial Institutions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VI (DALT 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5397))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we investigate two related aspects of the formalization of open interaction systems: how to specify norms, and how to enforce them by means of sanctions. The problem of specifying the sanctions associated with the violation of norms is crucial in an open system because, given that the compliance of autonomous agents to obligations and prohibitions cannot be taken for granted, norm enforcement is necessary to constrain the possible evolutions of the system, thus obtaining a degree of predictability that makes it rational for agents to interact with the system. In our model, we introduce a construct for the definition of norms in the design of artificial institutions, expressed in terms of roles and event times, which, when certain activating events take place, is transformed into commitments of the agents playing certain roles. Norms also specify different types of sanctions associated with their violation. In the paper, we analyze the concept of sanction in detail and propose a mechanism through which sanctions can be applied.

Supported by the Hasler Foundation project number 2204 title “Artificial institutions: specification of open distributed interaction systems”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Animated Specifications of Computational Societies. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 535–542. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbuceanu, M., Gray, T., Mankovski, S.: Coordinating with obligations. In: Sycara, K.P., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 1998), pp. 62–69. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Contracts as legal institutions in organizations of autonomous agents. In: Dignum, V., Corkill, D., Jonker, C., Dignum, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 948–955. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cliffe, O., Vos, M.D., Padget, J.: Specifying and Reasoning About Multiple Institutions. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 67–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Esteva, M., Padget, J., Sierra, C.: Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS, vol. 2333, pp. 348–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Esteva, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Rosell, B., Arcos, J.L.: AMELI: An Agent-based Middleware for Electronic Institutions. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 236–243. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fornara, N.: Interaction and Communication among Autonomous Agents in Multiagent Systems. PhD thesis, Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Lugano, Switzerland (2003), http://doc.rero.ch

  8. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: A commitment-based approach to agent communication. Applied Artificial Intelligence an International Journal 18(9-10), 853–866 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Colombetti, M.: Agent communication and institutional reality. In: van Eijk, R., Huget, M., Dignum, F. (eds.) AC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3396, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Colombetti, M.: Agent communication and artificial institutions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(2), 121–142 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: Artificial institutions: A model of institutional reality for open multiagent systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16(1), 89–105 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Implementing norms in electronic institutions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 667–673. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossi, D., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Ubi lex, ibi poena: Designing norm enforcement in e-institutions. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4386, pp. 101–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, H.L.A.: The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, A., Sergot, M.J.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429–445 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kagal, L., Finin, T.: Modeling Conversation Policies using Permissions and Obligations. In: van Eijk, R., Huget, M., Dignum, F. (eds.) AC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3396, pp. 123–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lomuscio, A., Sergot, M.: A formulation of violation, error recovery, and enforcement in the bit transmission problem. Journal of Applied Logic (Selected articles from DEON 2002 - London) 1(2), 93–116 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Normative Agent Reasoning in Dynamic Societies. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 535–542. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A Normative Framework for Agent-Based Systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Normative Multi-Agent Systems, Hatfield (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moses, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Artificial social systems. Computers and AI 14(6), 533–562 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Pacheco, O., Carmo, J.: A Role Based Model for the Normative Specification of Organized Collective Agency and Agents Interaction. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 6(2), 145–184 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Searle, J.R.: The construction of social reality. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vázquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Implementing Norms in Multiagent Systems. In: Lindemann, G., Denzinger, J., Timm, I.J., Unland, R. (eds.) MATES 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3187, pp. 313–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Organizing multiagent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11(3), 307–360 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Viganò, F.: A Framework for Model Checking Institutions. In: Edelkamp, S., Lomuscio, A. (eds.) MoChArt IV. LNCS, vol. 4428, pp. 129–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Viganò, F., Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: An Event Driven Approach to Norms in Artificial Institutions. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Simao Sichman, J., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3913, pp. 142–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yolum, P., Singh, M.: Reasoning about commitment in the event calculus: An approach for specifying and executing protocols. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 42, 227–253 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 12(3), 317–370 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fornara, N., Colombetti, M. (2009). Specifying and Enforcing Norms in Artificial Institutions. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds) Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VI. DALT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5397. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93920-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93920-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-93919-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-93920-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics