Skip to main content

The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes: The Measurement of Intangibles

Decision Making under Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 103))

Abstract

Multicriteria thinking demonstrates that in order to make a best choice in a decision, discussion and cause-effect reasoning are inadequate to learn what the best overall outcome is. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and its generalization to dependence and feedback, the Analytic Network Process (ANP), provide a comprehensive structure and mathematics to incorporate measurements for tangible criteria and derive priorities for intangible criteria to enable one to choose a best alternative for a decision. It overcomes so-called bounded rationality that is based on the assumption of transitivity by including in its structures and calculations, the sensitivity and depth of feelings associated with understanding and the imagination and awareness needed to address all the concerns. The AHP can cope with the inherent subjectivity in all decision making, and make it explicit to the stakeholders through relative quantitative priorities. It also provides the means to validate outcomes when measurements are available to show that it does not do number crunching without meaningful justification. It can deal with the benefits, opportunities, costs and risks separately and bring them together to determine the best overall outcome. One can also perform dynamic sensitivity analysis of changes in judgments to ensure that the best outcome is stable. In an award from the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) given to the author in October 2008 it is written: “The AHP has revolutionized how we resolve complex decision problems... the AHP has been applied worldwide to help decision makers in every conceivable decision context across both the public and private sectors, with literally thousands of reported applications.”

this chapter which originally appeared in Int. J. Applied Decision Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008 [7] (Interscience retains the copyright), is based on material provided by this author and on his research

visiting student who assisted in preparation of paper

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Buede and D.T. Maxwell. Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi-criteria methodolo-gies. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:1–21, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T.L. Saaty. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.L. Saaty. Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.L. Saaty and Y. Cho. The decision by the US congress on China’s trade status: A multicriteria analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35:243–252, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T.L. Saaty and M. Ozdemir. The Encyclicon. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.L. Saaty and K. Peniwati. Group Decision Making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.L. Saaty and M. Sodenkamp. Making decisions in hierarchic and network systems. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 1(1):24–79, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T.L. Saaty and L.T. Tran. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8):962–975, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T.L. Saaty and L.G. Vargas. The possibility of group welfare functions. Information Technology and Decision Making, 4(2):167–176, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas L. Saaty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saaty, T.L., Sodenkamp, M. (2010). The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes: The Measurement of Intangibles. In: Zopounidis, C., Pardalos, P. (eds) Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis. Applied Optimization, vol 103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics