Abstract
Multicriteria thinking demonstrates that in order to make a best choice in a decision, discussion and cause-effect reasoning are inadequate to learn what the best overall outcome is. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and its generalization to dependence and feedback, the Analytic Network Process (ANP), provide a comprehensive structure and mathematics to incorporate measurements for tangible criteria and derive priorities for intangible criteria to enable one to choose a best alternative for a decision. It overcomes so-called bounded rationality that is based on the assumption of transitivity by including in its structures and calculations, the sensitivity and depth of feelings associated with understanding and the imagination and awareness needed to address all the concerns. The AHP can cope with the inherent subjectivity in all decision making, and make it explicit to the stakeholders through relative quantitative priorities. It also provides the means to validate outcomes when measurements are available to show that it does not do number crunching without meaningful justification. It can deal with the benefits, opportunities, costs and risks separately and bring them together to determine the best overall outcome. One can also perform dynamic sensitivity analysis of changes in judgments to ensure that the best outcome is stable. In an award from the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) given to the author in October 2008 it is written: “The AHP has revolutionized how we resolve complex decision problems... the AHP has been applied worldwide to help decision makers in every conceivable decision context across both the public and private sectors, with literally thousands of reported applications.”
this chapter which originally appeared in Int. J. Applied Decision Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008 [7] (Interscience retains the copyright), is based on material provided by this author and on his research
visiting student who assisted in preparation of paper
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Buede and D.T. Maxwell. Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi-criteria methodolo-gies. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:1–21, 1995.
T.L. Saaty. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.
T.L. Saaty. Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.
T.L. Saaty and Y. Cho. The decision by the US congress on China’s trade status: A multicriteria analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35:243–252, 2001.
T.L. Saaty and M. Ozdemir. The Encyclicon. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.
T.L. Saaty and K. Peniwati. Group Decision Making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.
T.L. Saaty and M. Sodenkamp. Making decisions in hierarchic and network systems. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 1(1):24–79, 2008.
T.L. Saaty and L.T. Tran. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8):962–975, 2007.
T.L. Saaty and L.G. Vargas. The possibility of group welfare functions. Information Technology and Decision Making, 4(2):167–176, 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saaty, T.L., Sodenkamp, M. (2010). The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes: The Measurement of Intangibles. In: Zopounidis, C., Pardalos, P. (eds) Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis. Applied Optimization, vol 103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92827-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92828-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)