Skip to main content

A Proposal for Recognizing Reputation within Communities of Practice

  • Conference paper
Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design IV (CSCWD 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5236))

  • 1409 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most critical points for Communities of Practice is shared information credibility. Professionals only feel secure to reuse solutions presented and discussed within the scope of the community if a process of trusting is well established among its members at that moment. We propose the use of Reputation Systems to promote trust among participants and, consequently, stimulate participation through the recording of relevant information, such as ideas, opinions, solutions, and recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, M., Singh, J.P.: Computing and Using Reputation for Internet Ratings. In: EC 2001. October 14-17, 2001. Tampa, Florida, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cruz, C.C.P., Motta, C.L.R.: Um Modelo de Sistema de Reputação para Comunidades Virtuais. XVII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação. November 08-10, 2006. Brasília – DF, Brazil (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport, T.H.: Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performances And Results from Knowledge Workers. Harvard Business School Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dellarocas, C.S.: Building Trust Online: The Design of robust Reputation Reporting Mechanisms for Online Trading Communities. In: Building Trust Online, Chapter VII (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gouvêa, M.T.A.: Loyalty Model for Communities of Practice Master Dissertation, NCE/UFRJ – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2005) (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gouvêa, M.T.A., Motta, C.L.R., Santoro, F.M.: Recommendation as a Mechanism to Induce Participation in Communities of Practice. In: Shen, W.-m., Chao, K.-M., Lin, Z., Barthès, J.-P.A., James, A. (eds.) CSCWD 2005. LNCS, vol. 3865, pp. 92–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hildenbrand, B.A.: ActivUFRJ: Ambiente Colaborativo de Trabalho Integrado e Virtual. Projeto Final de Curso (Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro-RJ (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, C., Davis, J., Farnham, S.: Finding Others Online: Reputation Systems for Social Online Spaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Josang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A Survey of Trust and Reputation Systems for Online Service Provision, Distributed Systems Technology Centre and Information Security Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Qld 4001, Australia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lesser, E., Prusak, L.: Communities of practice, social capital and organizational knowledge, White paper, IBM Institute for Knowledge Management, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lopes, A.C.F.: Um método para a geração de estimativas de reputação mais precisas perante a oscilação de comportamento das entidades avaliadas. Dissertação de Mestrado (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Computação). Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói-RJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mui, L., Halberstadt, A., Mohtashemi, M.: Notions of Reputation in Multi-Agents Systems: A Review. In: AAMAS 2002, Bologna, Italy (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Donovan, J., Smyth, B.: Trust in Recommender Systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces - IUI 2005, San Diego, California, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender Systems. Communications of the ACM 40(3), 56–58 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., Kuwabara, K.: Reputation Systems. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline - Art and Practice of the Organization that Learns, New York, Doubleday (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wenger, E.C., Snyder, W.M.: Communities of Practice - The Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review, 139–145 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wenger, E.C., Snyder, W.M., McDermott, R.: Cultivating Communities of Practice - A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cruz, C.C.P., Gouvêa, M.T.A., Motta, C.L.R., Santoro, F.M. (2008). A Proposal for Recognizing Reputation within Communities of Practice. In: Shen, W., Yong, J., Yang, Y., Barthès, JP.A., Luo, J. (eds) Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design IV. CSCWD 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5236. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92719-8_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92719-8_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92718-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92719-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics