Genetically Evolved Fuzzy Rule-Based Classifiers and Application to Automotive Classification

  • Teck Wee Chua
  • Woei Wan Tan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5361)


Type-2 fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) have been treated as a magic black box which can better handle uncertainties due to the footprint of uncertainty (FOU). Although the results in control applications are promising, the advantages of type-2 framework in fuzzy pattern classification is still unclear due to different forms of outputs produced by both systems. This paper aims at investigating if type-2 fuzzy classifier can deliver a better performance when there exists imprecise decision boundary caused by improper feature extraction method. Genetic Algorithm (GA) is used to tune the fuzzy classifiers under Pittsburgh scheme. The proposed fuzzy classifiers have been successfully applied to an automotive application whereby the classifier needs to detect the presence of human in a vehicle. Results reveal that type-2 classifier has the edge over type-1 classifier when the decision boundaries are imprecise and the fuzzy classifier itself has not enough degrees of freedom to construct a suitable boundary. Conversely, when decision boundaries are clear, the advantage of type-2 framework may not be significant anymore. In any case, the performance of a type-2 fuzzy classifier is at least comparable with a type-1 fuzzy classifier. When dealing with real world classification problem where the uncertainty is usually difficult to be estimated, type-2 fuzzy classifier can be a more rational choice.


Type-2 Fuzzy Fuzzy Rule-Based Classifier Genetic-Fuzzy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mendel, J.: Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Starczewski, J.: What Differs Interval Type-2 FLS from Type-1 FLS? In: Rutkowski, L., Siekmann, J.H., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) ICAISC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3070, pp. 381–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, H., Mendel, J.: Classification of Battlefield Ground Vehicles Using Acoustic Features and Fuzzy Logic Rule-Based Classifiers. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 15(1), 56–72 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ravi, V., Reddy, P.J., Zimmermann, H.-J.: Pattern Classification with Principal Component Analysis and Fuzzy Rule Bases. European Journal of Operational Research 126, 526–533 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chua, T.W., Tan, W.W.: GA Optimisation of Non-Singleton Fuzzy Logic System for ECG Classification. In: Proceeding of IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1677–1684 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mendel, J., Hagras, H., John, R.I.: Standard Background Material About Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems That Can Be Used By All Authors. IEEE Computational Intelligence SocietyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valenzuela-Rendón, M.: The Fuzzy Classifier System. Motivations and First Results. In: Schwefel, H.-P., Männer, R. (eds.) PPSN 1990. LNCS, vol. 496, pp. 338–342. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuncheva, L.I.: Fuzzy Classifier Design. Physica-Verlag, New York (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ford Classification Challenge,
  10. 10.
    Eagen, et al.: System and Method for Detecting Presence of a Huma. In a Vehicle. U.S. Patent No. 7,353,088 B2 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishibuchi, H., Nakashima, T.: Effect of Rule Weights in Fuzzy Rule-Based Classification Systems. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems 9(4), 506–515 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teck Wee Chua
    • 1
  • Woei Wan Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations