Skip to main content

Program Complexity in Hierarchical Module Checking

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5330))

Abstract

Module checking is a well investigated technique for verifying the correctness of open systems, which are systems characterized by an ongoing interaction with an external environment. In the classical module checking framework, in order to check whether an open system satisfies a required property, we first translate the entire system into an open model (module) that collects all possible behaviors of the environment and then check it with respect to a formal specification of the property.

Recently, in the case of closed system, Alur and Yannakakis have considered hierarchical structure models in order to have models exponentially more succinct. A hierarchical model uses as nodes both ordinary nodes and supernodes, which are hierarchical models themselves. For CTL specifications, it has been shown that for the simple case of models having only single-exit supernodes, the hierarchical model checking problem is not harder than the classical one. On the contrary, for the more general multiple-exit case, the problem becomes Pspace-complete.

In this paper, we investigate the program complexity of the CTL hierarchical module checking problem, that is, we consider the module checking problem for a fixed CTL formula and modules having also supernodes that are modules themselves. By exploiting an automata-theoretic approach through the introduction of hierarchical Büchi tree automata, we show that, in the single-exit case, the addressed problem remains in Ptime, while in the multiple-exit case, it becomes Pspace-complete.

Work partially supported by MIUR PRIN Project no.2007-9E5KM8 and grant “Formal Methods for Closed and Open Systems” ex-60% 2006 Università di Salerno.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Benedikt, M., Etessami, K., Godefroid, P., Reps, T.W., Yannakakis, M.: Analysis of recursive state machines. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 27(4), 786–818 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aminof, B., Murano, A., Vardi, M.Y.: Pushdown module checking with imperfect information. In: Caires, L., Vasconcelos, V.T. (eds.) CONCUR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4703, pp. 460–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alur, R., Yannakakis, M.: Model checking of hierarchical state machines. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 23(3), 273–303 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozzelli, L., Murano, A., Peron, A.: Pushdown module checking. In: Sutcliffe, G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3835, pp. 504–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and verification of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: An Automata-Theoretic Approach to Branching-Time Model Checking. J. of the ACM 47(2), 312–360 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Module Checking. Information and Computation 164(2), 322–344 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. LaTorre, S., Napoli, M., Parente, M., Parlato, G.: Verification of scope-dependent hierarchical state machines. Information and Computation 206(9,10), 1161–1177 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Queille, J.P., Sifakis, J.: Specification and verification of concurrent programs in Cesar. In: Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Montanari, U. (eds.) Programming 1982. LNCS, vol. 137, pp. 337–351. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabin, M.O.: Weakly definable relations and special automata. Mathematical Logic and Foundations of Set theory (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about the past with two-way automata. In: Larsen, K.G., Skyum, S., Winskel, G. (eds.) ICALP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1443, pp. 628–641. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. J. of Computer and System Sciences 32(2), 182–221 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murano, A., Napoli, M., Parente, M. (2008). Program Complexity in Hierarchical Module Checking. In: Cervesato, I., Veith, H., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5330. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89439-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89439-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89438-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89439-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics