Advertisement

Quality-Driven Orchestration of Services

  • Martin Kunz
  • Steffen Mencke
  • Niko Zenker
  • René Braungarten
  • Reiner Dumke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5338)

Abstract

The importance of providing integration architectures in every field of application is beyond controversy these days. Unfortunately existing solutions are focusing mainly on functionality. But for the success of Systems Integration in the long run, the quality of developed architectures is of substantial interest. Therefore a framework for quality-driven creation of architectures is proposed in this paper. Besides these quality-oriented characteristic the usage of semantic knowledge and structured process descriptions enable an automatic procedure. Especially the combination of both is a promising approach.

Keywords

software quality quality driven design service orchestration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Ontology Web Language for Services (OWL-S) (2004), http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/
  2. 2.
    Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., de Bruijn, J., Stollberg, M., Roman, D., Domingue, J.: Enabling Semantic Web Services. The Web Service Modeling Ontology. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tian, M.: QoS integration in Web services with the WS-QoS framework. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Mathematics und Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Service Semantics – WSDL-S. W3C Member Submission (2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSDL-S/
  5. 5.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language W3C Recommendation (2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/
  6. 6.
    Studer, R., Grimm, S., Abecker, A. (eds.): Semantic Web Services. Concepts, Technologies, and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berbner, R.: Quality of service support in service-oriented workflows, (in German), Ph.D Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt (2007) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menascé, D.A., Dubey, V.: Utility-based QoS Brokering in Service Oriented Architectures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Hendler, J.: Template-based composition of semantic web services. In: Proc. AAAI fall symposium on agents and the semantic web, Virginia, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001: Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model (2001), http://www.iso.org
  11. 11.
    Aggarwal, R., Verma, K., Miller, J., Milnor, W.: Constraint driven web service composition in METEOR-S. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2004), pp. 23–30 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maximilien, E.M., Singh, M.P.: Multiagent System for Dynamic Web Services Selection. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS Workshop on Service-Oriented Computing and Agent-Based Engineering (SOCABE), Utrecht, Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO/IEC 15939: Information Technology — Software Engineering —Software Measurement Process (2002) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mencke, S., Dumke, R.: Didactical Ontologies. Emerging Technologies in e-Learning 3(1), 65–73 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Object Management Group: Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Infrastructure, V2.1.2, Object Management Group (2007) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Object Management Group: Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN), Object Management Group (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mencke, S., Dumke, R.: A Hierarchy of Ontologies for Didactics-Enhanced E-learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Computer aided Learning (ICL 2007), Villach, Austria (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The Experience Factory, pp. 469–476. Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Basili, V.R.: The Experience Factory: Packaging Software Experiences. In: Proceedings of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s 14th Annual Software Engineering Workshop, ISERN-99-19 Production and Maintenance of Software Measurement Models (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kunz, M., Schmietendorf, A., Dumke, R., Wille, C.: Towards a service-oriented measurement infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Software Measurement European Forum (Smef 2006), Rome, Italy, pp. 197–208 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin, M., Olsina, L.: Towards an Ontology for Software Metrics and Indicators as the Foundation for a Cataloging Web System/ GIDIS, Department of Informatics, Engineering School at UNLPam, LaPampa, Argentina (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kunz, M., Kernchen, S., Dumke, R., Schmietendorf, A.: Ontology-based web-service for object-oriented metrics. In: Abran, A., Bundschuh, M., Büren, G., Dumke, R.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Measurement and DASMA Software Metrik Kongress (IWSM/MetriKon 2006), pp. 99–106. Shaker Publ., Germany (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Kunz
    • 1
  • Steffen Mencke
    • 1
  • Niko Zenker
    • 2
  • René Braungarten
    • 1
  • Reiner Dumke
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Engineering GroupUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Business InformaticsUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations