Skip to main content

Cognitive Processes Causing the Relationship between Aesthetics and Usability

  • Conference paper
HCI and Usability for Education and Work (USAB 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5298))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We conducted an experiment to find out which cognitive processes underlie the high correlations between aesthetic impression and perceived usability of a user interface reported in several studies. Four online shops differing in colour scheme and usability level were created and tested before and after an interaction period to gain support for two differing models of explanation. One stems from Norman who hypothesizes that mood is a mediator between design and perceived usability whereas the other is based on the well known “What is beautiful is good” phenomenon from social psychology and market research. The data provide support for the approach of Norman whereas the high correlations couldn’t be replicated. Another interesting finding was that our results militate rather for a “What is usable is beautiful”- relation than the other way round as hypothesized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C.: What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers 15, 429–452 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hassenzahl, M.: The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 481–499 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurosu, M., Kashimura, K.: Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis of the determinants of the apparent usability. In: Conference Companion of human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, pp. 292–293 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tractinsky, N.: Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirical Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. In: CHI 1997, Electronic Publications (1997), http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/paper/nt.htm

  6. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 127–145 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassenzahl, M.: The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness and Usability in Interactive Products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 319–349 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schrepp, M., Held, T., Laugwitz, B.: On the influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software. Interacting with Computers 18(5), 1055–1069 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Igbaria, M., Schiffman, S.J., Wieckowski, T.J.: The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 13, 349–361 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Kleinberger, T., Seffah, A., Javahery, H.: Investigating Usability Metrics for the Design and Development of Applications for the Elderly. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 98–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, Boulder Colorado (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isen, A.M.: Positive affect and decision making. In: Lewis, M., Haviland, J.M. (eds.) Handbook of emotions, 2nd edn., pp. 417–435. Guilford Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petty, R., Cacioppo, J.: Communication and Persuasion. Central and Peripheral Routes to attitude change. Springer, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace, Forth Worth (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwarz, N.: Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings. In: Feldman-Barrett, L., Salovey, P. (eds.) The wisdom of feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence, pp. 144–166. Guilford Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fiedler, K.: Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accomodation. In: Martin, L.L., Clore, G.L. (eds.) Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User’s Guidebook, pp. 85–98. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dion, K.K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E.: What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 285–290 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., Longo, L.C.: What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110, 109–128 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dick, A., Dipankar, C., Gabriel, B.: Memory-Based Inference During Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research 17, 82–93 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ford, G.T., Smith, R.A.: Inferential Beliefs in Consumer Evaluations: An Assessment of Alternative Processing Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 363–371 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Albert, D.: Dynamic Media in Computer Science Education; Content Complexity and Learning Performance: Is Less More? Educational Technology & Society 11, 419–432 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. STRATO AG Online Shops, http://www.strato.de/shops/index.html

  23. Adobe Labs Kuler, http://kuler.adobe.com/

  24. Bradley, R.A., Terry, M.E.: Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 324–345 (1952)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Luce, R.D.: Individual Choice Behaviours: A Theoretical Analysis. Wiley, New York (1959)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 1994 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 152–158. ACM Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laugwitz, B., Schrepp, M., Held, T.: Konstruktion eines Fragebogens zur Messung der User Experience von Softwareprodukten. In: Heinecke, A.M., Paul, H. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2006: Mensch und Computer im StrukturWandel, pp. 125–134. Oldenbourg Verlag, München (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bradley, M., Lang, P.: Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry 1, 49–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Little, A.C., Burt, D.M., Perrett, D.I.: What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality. Personality and Individual Differences 41, 1107–1118 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ilmberger, W., Schrepp, M., Held, T. (2008). Cognitive Processes Causing the Relationship between Aesthetics and Usability. In: Holzinger, A. (eds) HCI and Usability for Education and Work. USAB 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5298. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89349-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89350-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics