A number of unsustainable trends concerning land, water and air can be observed locally, regionally and globally (European Environment Agency, 2005). Scientific method in a traditional sense of positivism has a role in making such observations and measurements visible. Natural science contributes to our understanding of climate change issues, water shortages of specific qualities or land degradation. Also social sciences have a role in relation to sustainable development (SD). In addition to the focus on specific environmental and natural resource (or ecosystem) parameters, we should focus on individuals and organisations as actors. How do specific individuals as actors understand ‘sustainable development’ and how do they perceive their own roles in relation to SD? These kinds of questions are as relevant for water specialists as for other actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackerman F, Heinzerling L (2004) Priceless. On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. The New Press, New York
Bebbington J, Brown J, Frame B (2007) Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecol Econ 61(2/3):224–236
Connolly WE 1993 (1974) The Terms of political discourse, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
Dröge S (2003) International institutions for sustainability. DIW, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (German Institute for Economics Research). Research Notes 30. Berlin (www.sustainabilityeconomics.de)
Etzioni A (1988) The moral dimension. Towards a new economics. Free Press, New York
European Environment Agency (2005) The European Environment. State and Outlook 2005. Copenhagen. http://reports.eea.eu.int/stateofenvironmentreport2005/
Ford D (ed) (1990) Understanding business markets. Interaction, relationships, networks. Academic Press, London
Fullbrook E (ed) (2003) The Crisis in economics. The post-autistic economics movement: the first 600 days. Routledge, London
Fullbrook E (ed) (2004) A guide to what’s wrong with economics. Anthem Press, London
Fullbrook E (ed) (2007) Real world economics. A post-autistic economics reader. Anthem Press, London
Fusfeld DR (1994) The age of the economist, 7th edn. HarperCollins, New York
George S (2000) A short history of neoliberalism. Twenty years of elite economics and emerging opportunities for structural change. In: Bello W, Bullard N, Malhotra K (eds) Global finance. New thinking on regulating speculative capital markets, Zed Books, London, pp 27–35
Giroux HA (2004) The terror of neoliberalism. Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder
Harremoës P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B, Guedes Vaz S (eds) (2002) The precautionary principle in the 20th Century. Late lessons from early warnings. (European Environmental Agency). Earthscan, London
International Confederation of Associations for Pluralism in Economics (www.icape.org)
Korten DC (2001) When corporations rule the world, 2nd edn. Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, Conn
Kras E (2007) The blockage. Rethinking organizational principles for the 21st century. American Literary Press, Baltimore, Maryland
Post-autistic economics review, now Real-world Economics Review (www.paecon.net)
Söderbaum P (2000) Ecological economics. A political economics approach to environment and development. Earthscan, London
Söderbaum P (2005a) Actors, problem perceptions, strategies for sustainable development. Water policy in relation to paradigms, ideologies, institutions. In: Biswas AK, Tortajada C (eds) Appraising sustainable development. Water management and environmental challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–111
Söderbaum P (2005b) Democracy, decision-making, and sustainable development: damconstruction as an example. Int J Water 3(2):107–120
Söderbaum P (2006) Democracy and sustainable development. What is the alternative to CBA? Integr Environ Assess Manag 2(2):182–190, April
Söderbaum P (2007) Issues of paradigm, ideology and democracy in sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:613–626
Söderbaum P (2008) Understanding sustainability economics. Towards pluralism in economics. Earthscan, London
The World Commission on Dams (The Report by the World Commission on Dams) (2000) Dams and development. A new framework for decision-making. Earthscan, London
The World Commission on environment and Development (The Brundtland Report) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Söderbaum, P. (2009). Science, Ideology and Sustainable Development: An Actor-Oriented Approach. In: Biswas, A.K., Tortajada, C., Izquierdo, R. (eds) Water Management in 2020 and Beyond. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89346-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89346-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89345-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89346-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)