Skip to main content

Some Results on the Completeness of Approximation Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5351))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1322 Accesses

Abstract

We present two results relating the completeness condition of the 0-approximation for two formalisms: the action description language \({\mathcal A}\) and the situation calculus. The first result suggests that the condition for the situation calculus formalism implies the condition for the action language formalism. The second result indicates that an action theory in \({\mathcal A}\) can sometimes be simplified to an equivalent action theory whose completeness condition is weaker than the original theory for certain queries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balduccini, M., Gelfond, M.: Diagnostic Reasoning with A-Prolog. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 3(4,5), 425–461 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, C., Gelfond, M.: Reasoning agents in dynamic domains, pp. 257–279. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baral, C., Kreinovich, V., Trejo, R.: Computational complexity of planning and approximate planning in the presence of incompleteness. Artificial Intelligence 122, 241–267 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Representing actions and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming 17(2,3,4), 301–323 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kartha, G.: Soundness and completeness theorems for three formalizations of action. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 724–729. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levesque, H.J.: A completeness result for reasoning with incomplete first-order knowledge bases. In: KR, pp. 14–23 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, Y., Levesque, H.: Tractable reasoning with incomplete first-order knowledge in dynamic systems with context-dependent actions. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, Edinburgh, Scotland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthy, J.: Programs with common sense. In: Proceedings of the Teddington Conference on the Mechanization of Thought Processes, London, pp. 75–91. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.: Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, pp. 463–502. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDermott, D.: A critique of pure reason. Computational Intelligence 3, 151–160 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, R.: A formal theory of knowledge and action. In: Hobbs, J., Moore, R. (eds.) Formal theories of the commonsense world. Ablex, Norwood (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, R.: The frame problem in the situation calculus: A simple solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression. In: Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation, pp. 359–380. Academic Press, London (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Son, T.C., Baral, C.: Formalizing sensing actions - a transition function based approach. Artificial Intelligence 125(1-2), 19–91 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Son, T.C., Tu, P.H.: On the Completeness of Approximation Based Reasoning and Planning in Action Theories with Incomplete Information. In: Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 481–491 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tu, P.H.: Reasoning and Planning With Incomplete Information in the Presence of Static Causal Laws. Ph.D thesis, New Mexico State University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tran, C.S., Pontelli, E. (2008). Some Results on the Completeness of Approximation Based Reasoning. In: Ho, TB., Zhou, ZH. (eds) PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89196-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89197-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics