Skip to main content

Learning, Information Exchange, and Joint-Deliberation through Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems

  • Conference paper
  • 1621 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5333))

Abstract

Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) can give agents the capability of learning from their own experience and solve new problems, however, in a multi-agent system, the ability of agents to collaborate is also crucial. In this paper we present an argumentation framework (AMAL) designed to provide learning agents with collaborative problem solving (joint deliberation) and information sharing capabilities (learning from communication). We will introduce the idea of CBR multi-agent systems (\(\mathcal{M}{\normalfont \textsf{AC}}\) systems), outline our argumentation framework and provide several examples of new tasks that agents in a \(\mathcal{M}\normalfont \textsf{AC}\) system can undertake thanks to the argumentation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications 7(1), 39–59 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L., Serrurier, M.: Arguing and explaining classifications. In: Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds.) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4946, pp. 164–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewka, G.: Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation 11(2), 257–282 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesñevar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: Formalizing Defeasible Argumentation using Labelled Deductive Systems. Journal of Computer Science & Technology 1(4), 18–33 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fukumoto, T., Sawamura, H.: Argumentation-based learning. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 17–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Leake, D., Sooriamurthi, R.: Automatically selecting strategies for multi-case-base reasoning. In: Craw, S., Preece, A.D. (eds.) ECCBR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2416, pp. 204–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Martín, F.J., Plaza, E., Arcos, J.-L.: Knowledge and experience reuse through communications among competent (peer) agents. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 9(3), 319–341 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Collaborative case-based reasoning: Applications in personalized route planning. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I., Yang, Q. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 362–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Bratko, I.: Argument based machine learning. machine learning 171, 922–937 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ontañón, S., Plaza, E.: Learning and joint deliberation through argumentation in multi-agent systems. In: Proc. AAMAS 2007, pp. 971–978. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plaza, E., Ontañón, S.: Learning collaboration strategies for committees of learning agents. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13, 429–461 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagendra Prassad, M.V., Lesser, V.R., Lander, S.: Retrieval and reasoning in distributed case bases. Technical report, UMass Computer Science Department (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sycara, K., Kraus, S., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence Journal 104, 1–69 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings, N.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8, 261–292 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ontañón, S., Plaza, E. (2008). Learning, Information Exchange, and Joint-Deliberation through Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. OTM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88874-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88875-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics