Abstract
In recent years, we have been studying approaches to the realistic modeling of natural systems, especially biological systems. We have tested several of these in a project devoted to modeling pancreatic organogenesis, a complex system that dynamically promotes structural and molecular development. Here, we describe one of these approaches—a kind of ‘divide and conquer’ technique, in which the system is disassembled into modules to specify behaviors on the scale of the organ (i.e., morphogenesis) and the cell (i.e., molecular interactions). At run-time, these modules are re-assembled to direct development in individual cells. This approach employs multi-scaling and dynamics, two important characteristics of natural systems, but avoids cross-scaling. It thus appears to be useful for systems in which the importance of cross-scaling seems to be less significant, such as the development of phyllotaxis in plants. In pancreatic organogenesis, cross-scaling was found to be a significant characteristic, and thus by using ‘divide and conquer’ we could cover only its preliminary stages. We discuss the approach and our use of it, as well as he various methods to analyze the achievements and limitations of the end result.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
3D Game Studio. www.3dgamestudio.com
Axelrod JD (2006) Cell shape in proliferating epithelia: a multifaceted problem. Cell 126:643–645
Cardelli L (2005) Abstract machines of systems biology. Trans Comput Syst Biol 3:145–168
Chakrabarti SK, Mirmira RG (2003) Transcription factors direct the development and function of pancreatic beta cells. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14:78–84
Chu K, Nemoz-Gaillard E, Tsai MJ (2001) BETA2 and pancreatic islet development. Recent Prog Horm Res 56:23–46
Ciliberto A, Novak B, Tyson JJ (2003) Mathematical model of the morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 163:1243–1254
Cohen IR, Harel D (2007) Explaining a complex living system: dynamics, multi-scaling and emergence. J R Soc Interface 4:175–182
Edelstein-Keshet L (2005) Mathematical models in biology. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
Edlund H (2002) Pancreatic organogenesis—developmental mechanisms and implications for therapy. Nat Rev Genet 3:524–532
Efroni S, Harel D, Cohen IR (2005) Reactive animation: realistic modeling of complex dynamic systems. IEEE Comput 38:38–47
Finkelstein A, Hetherington J, Li L, Margoninski O, Saffrey P, Seymour R, Warner A (2004) Computational challenges of systems biology. IEEE Comput 37(5):26–33
Fisher J, Henzinger TA (2007) Executable cell biology. Nat Biotechnol 25:1239–1249
Ghosh R, Tomlin C (2004) Symbolic reachable set computation of piecewise affine hybrid automata and its application to biological modelling: delta–notch protein signalling. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 1:170–183
Gibson MC, Patel AB, Nagpal R, Perrimon N (2006) The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia. Nature 442:1038–1041
Gorgevik D, Loskovska S, Mihajlov D (1994) Lindenmayer system application on the human kidney arterial system. In: Proceedings of the 12th international congress of the European federation for medical informatics, pp 127–131
Harel D (1987) Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci Comput Program 8:231–274
Harel D, Gery E (1997) Executable object modeling with statecharts. IEEE Comput 30:31–42
Harel D, Setty Y (2007) Generic reactive animation: realistic modeling of natural complex systems (submitted)
Heath J, Kwiatkowska M, Norman G, Parker D, Tymchyshyn O (2006) Probabilistic model checking of complex biological pathways. In: Priami C (ed) Proceedings of the computational methods in systems biology (CMSB’06). Lecture notes in bioinformatics, vol 4210. Springer, Berlin, pp 32–47
Jensen J (2004) Gene regulatory factors in pancreatic development. Dev Dyn 229:176–200
Kim SK, MacDonald RJ (2002) Signaling and transcriptional control of pancreatic organogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12:540–547
Lindenmayer A (1968) Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development. J Theor Biol 18:280–315
The MathWorks. www.mathworks.com
Mundermann L, Erasmus Y, Lane B, Coen E, Prusinkiewicz P (2005) Quantitative modeling of arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol 139:960–968
Mundermann L, MacMurchy P, Pivovarov J, Prusinkiewicz P (2003) Modeling lobed leaves. In: Proceedings of computer graphics international
Murtaugh LC, Melton DA (2003) Genes, signals, and lineages in pancreas development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:71–89
Nelson CM, Vanduijn MM, Inman JL, Fletcher DA, Bissell MJ (2006) Tissue geometry determines sites of mammary branching morphogenesis in organotypic cultures. Science 314:298–300
Noble D (2005) The heart is already working. Biochem Soc Trans 33:539–542
Pictet RL, Clark WR, Williams RH, Rutter WJ (1972) An ultrastructural analysis of the developing embryonic pancreas. Dev Biol 29:436–467
Priami C, Quaglia P (2004) Modelling the dynamics of biosystems. Brief Bioinform 5:259–269
Prusinkiewicz P (2004) Modeling plant growth and development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:79–83
Prusinkiewicz P, Hanan J (1989) Lindenmayer systems, fractals and plants. Springer, New York
Prusinkiewicz P, Rolland-Lagan AG (2006) Modeling plant morphogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:83–88
Regev A, Shapiro E (2002) Cellular abstractions: cells as computation. Nature 419:343
Regev A, Silverman W, Shapiro E (2001) Representation and simulation of biochemical processes using the pi-calculus process algebra. In: Pacific symposium on biocomputing, pp 459–470
Roux-Rouquié M, daRosa DS (2006) Ten top reasons for systems biology to get into model-driven engineering. In: GaMMa’06: proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on global integrated model management. New York, ACM, pp 55–58
Schonhoff SE, Giel-Moloney M, Leiter AB (2004) Minireview: development and differentiation of gut endocrine cells. Endocrinology 145:2639–2644
Segel LA (1984) Modeling dynamic phenomena in molecular and cellular biology. Cambridge University Press, New York
Segel LA (1991) Biological kinetics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Setty Y, Cohen IR, Dor Y, Harel D (2008) Four-dimensional realistic modeling of pancreatic organogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(51):20374–20379
Slack JM (1995) Developmental biology of the pancreas. Development 121:1569–1580
Smith RS, Guyomarc’h S, Mandel T, Reinhardt D, Kuhlemeier C, Prusinkiewicz P (2006) A plausible model of phyllotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1301–1306
Taubner C, Merker T (2005) Discrete modelling of the ethylene-pathway. In: ICDEW’05: proceedings of the 21st international conference on data engineering workshops. Washington, IEEE Computer Society, p 1152
Telelogic. www.telelogic.com
Webb K, White T (2006) Cell modeling with reusable agent-based formalisms. Appl Intell 24(2):169–181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Setty, Y., Cohen, I.R., Mayo, A.E., Harel, D. (2009). On Using Divide and Conquer in Modeling Natural Systems. In: Condon, A., Harel, D., Kok, J., Salomaa, A., Winfree, E. (eds) Algorithmic Bioprocesses. Natural Computing Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88869-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88869-7_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88868-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88869-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)