Skip to main content

The Impact of Process Standardization on Business Process Outsourcing Success

  • Chapter
Information Systems Outsourcing

It seems a safe bet to say that process standardization is desirable (Lee & Kim, 1997; Manrodt & Vitasek, 2004) and, particularly in service industries, offers technical interchangeability, compliance with regulations, and improved customer confidence (de Vries, 1999). Also, many expect that standardized business processes are better to outsource and there are empirical indications that business process standardization reduces the risks of BPO (Wüllenweber & Weitzel, 2007). Yet, despite the importance of both areas — process standards and outsourcing — neither the outsourcing nor standardization literature has so far offered a conclusive picture of the value of process standardization to business process outsourcing (BPO). In this paper, our overall research question thus is: What is the impact of business process standardization on BPO success?

We argue that process standardization has a direct and positive production cost effect on BPO success, since economies of scale and skill can be achieved more easily. Further, we expect an indirect and positive effect via improved contractual and relational governance means: process standardization allows defining clear and precise process output objectives to be met by the service provider. On the other side, uniformity of process activities facilitates communication and coordination between exchange partners. Our results provide strong evidence that process characteristics — such as the degree of standardization — are an important prerequisite for BPO ventures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J., & Narus, J. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., & Straub, D. (1998). Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. Banking Industry. MIS Quarterly, 4, 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R., Clemons, E. K., & Reddi, S. (2005). Just right outsourcing: Understanding and managing risk. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Houde, J.-F., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (2003). Characteristics of IT outsourcing contracts. 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (1998). Assessing the risk of IT outsourcing. 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., Rivard, S., & Smith, H. (2001). IT outsourcing risk management at British petroleum. 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Auguste, B. G., Hao, Y., Singer, M., & Wiegand, M. (2002). The other side of outsourcing.McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1979). The role of measurement in theory construction and hypothesis testing:Toward a holistic model. In O. C. Ferrell, S. W. Brown, & C. W. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptual and theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 15–32). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(September), 459–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable market and the theory of industry.New York: Structure Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, M. (2006). Applying multiple perspectives to the BPO decision: A case study of call centres in Australia. Journal of Information Technology, 21, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M. (2004). Vom IT- zum business process outsourcing. Bankmagazin, 53(2), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G., & Harker, P. (2002). Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Science, 48(10), 1314–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A.Marcoluides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing, 16(February), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. (2005). The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review, June,100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayasindhu, N. (2004). Information technology enabled process outsourcing and reengineering:Case study of a mortgage bank. New York: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Toni, A., & Panizzolo, R. (1993). Product and process standardization in intermittent and repetitive production. Journal of Production Research, 31(6), 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, H. (1999). Standardization. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer—Seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interor-ganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M. J. (1996). The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory part I and II. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38–87).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C., & Hanson, G. H. (2003). Ownership and control in outsourcing to China:Estimating the property rights theory of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2),729–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, D. F., Willcocks, L. P., & Lacity, M. C. (2003). Business process outsourcing: The promise of the ‘Enterprise Partnership‘ model Oxford: Templeton Executive Briefing, Templeton College, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fomin, V., & Lyytinen, K. (2000). How to distribute a cake before cutting it into pieces: Alice in Wonderland or radio engineers' gang in the Nordic countries? In K. Jakobs (Ed.), Information technology standards and standardization: A global perspective (pp. 222–239). Hershey, PA:IGI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Farmer, D. (1986). Make or buy — A key strategic issue. Long Range Planning, 19(5),54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewald, H. (2006). Assessing the benefits and risks of business process outsourcing in the German banking industry. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewald, H., Wüllenweber, K., & Weitzel, T. (2006). The influence of perceived risks on banking managers' intention to outsource business processes — A study of the German banking and finance industry. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goles, T. (2001). The impact of the client—vendor relationship on information systems outsourcing success (p. 230). Houston: University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goles, T., & Chin, W. W. (2002). Relational exchange theory and IS outsourcing: Developing a scale to measure relationship factors. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, J. Dibbern (Eds.),Information systems outsourcing (pp. 221–250). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goles, T., & Chin, W. W. (2005). Information systems outsourcing relationship factors: Detailed conceptualization and initial evidence. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems,36(4), 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goo, J., Kim, D. J., & Cho, B. (2006). Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing:The construct and its measurement. Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems,Acapulco, Mexico, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, R., Puryear, R., & Phillips, S. (2005). Strategic sourcing from periphery to the core.Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Fisher, J. (1990). Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., Cheon, M., & Teng, J. (1996). The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Journal of Management Information Systems,12(4), 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurbaxani, V. (1996). The new world of information technology outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 39(7 July), 45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvey, J. K., & Melby, B. M. (1996). Information technology outsourcing transactions: Processes,strategies, and contracts. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., & Moore, J. E. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C. (1990). Plugging into strategic partnerships: The critical IS connection. Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1994). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(4),96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2002). Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing:The interaction approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. P. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships:Theory and practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. J. (1996). The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science, 7(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancellotti, R., Schein, O., Spang, S., & Stadler, V. (2003). ICT and operations outsourcing in banking. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 45(2), 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. (1995). Capabilities and coherence in firms and markets. In C. A. Montgomery (Ed.),Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis (pp. 71–100).Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-N., & Kim, Y.-G. (1997). Information systems outsourcing strategies for affiliated firms of the Korean Conglomerate Groups. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6(3), 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-N., & Kim, Y.-G. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success:Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems,15(4), 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. N., Miranda, S., & Kim, Y.-M. (2004). IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency,and configurational explanations of success. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 110–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Determinants of information technology outsourcing:A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). An empirical study of information technology outsourcing:Benefits, risk and performance implications. Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Amsterdam, 1995 (pp. 277–288).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, I. R. (1974). The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47(3),691–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, D., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2006). Successfully governing business process outsourcing relationships. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manrodt, K. B., & Vitasek, K. (2004). Global process standardization: A case study. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. D., & White, R. W. (1983). Economies of scale and economies of scope in multiproduct financial institutions: A study of British Columbia Credit Unions. Journal of Finance, 38, 887–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, K., Rajagopalan, S., Rao, H. R., & Chaudhurry, A. (1996). A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 39(7), 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narus, J., & Anderson, J. (1987). Distribution contributions to partnerships with manufacturers. Business Horizons, 30, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. (1981). Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(February), 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. Boston: Pittman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. (2006). Process standards: Pursuing best practices. Controlling Engineering, 53, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (1998). Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanation for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management Journal, 19(9), 853–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, May–June, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakumar, A., & Cooper, B. (2004). Process standardization proves profitable. Quality, 43(2), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, A. C., & Corbitt, B. (2004). IT-supported business process outsourcing (BPO): The good, the bad and the ugly. Eight Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai, China, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C., Gebelt, M., & Hu, Q. (1997). Achieving success in information systems qutsourc-ing. California Management Review, 39(2), 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, J.M. (2001). Enabling customization using standardized operations. California Management Review 43 (3), 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embed-dedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzel, T., Beimborn, D., & König, W. (2005). A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quarterly, 30, 489–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L., Hindle, J., Feeny, D. F., & Lacity, M. C. (2004). IT and business process outsourcing: The knowledge potential. Information Systems Management, 21, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L. P., Lacity, M. C., & Kern, T. (1999). Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: Longitudinal case research at LISA. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(3), 285–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüllenweber, K., & Weitzel, T. (2007). An empirical exploration of how process standardization reduces outsourcing risk. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS40), Hawaii, USA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Wuellenweber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wuellenweber, K., Koenig, W., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T. (2009). The Impact of Process Standardization on Business Process Outsourcing Success. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88851-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics