Dynamic Multi-stream Transport Protocol

  • Seung-Joon Seok
  • Hyeong-Jun Kim
  • Kwang-Min Jung
  • Kyung-Hoe Kim
  • Chul-Hee Kang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5297)


Legacy TCP is not suitable in high speed network environments due to its slow response time to high speed link bandwidth (large scale window size). A number of solutions have been proposed to support scalability under high link bandwidth. However, other criteria such as fairness and friendliness, in additional to scalability, should be considered. Accordingly, this paper describes a transport protocol for high speed networks, referred to as DMS-TCP, which uses multiple end-to-end streams simultaneously and considers scalability, fairness and friendliness simultaneously. DMS-TCP describes a scheme that controls the number of streams according to network condition. In this paper, the performance of DMS-TCP is evaluated through NS-2 simulation. The simulation results demonstrate that DMS-TCP can be used efficiently in high speed networks.


Multi-Stream Transport Protocol Dynamic High-Speed Network 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Floyd, S.: HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion Windows. IETF RFC 3649 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Floyd, S., Ratnasamy, S., Shenker, S.: Modifying TCP’s Congestion Control for High Speeds. Internet draft (2002),
  3. 3.
    Dalton, L.A., Isen, C.: A study on High Speed TCP Protocols. In: IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 2, pp. 851–855 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altman, E., Barakat, C., Laborde, E.: Fairness Analysis of TCP/IP. Decision and Control 2000, vol. 1, pp. 61–66 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelly, T.: Scalable TCP: Improving Performance in HighSpeed Wide Area Networks. ACM Computer Communication Review 33, 83–91 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katabi, D., Handley, M., Rohrs, C.: Internet Congestion Control for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 43–54 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jin, C., Wei, D.X., Low, S.H.: Fast TCP: motivation, architecture, algorithms, performance. In: IEEE INFOCOMM, vol. 4, pp. 2490–2501 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsieh, H.-y., Sivakumar, R.: Parallel Transport: A New Transport Layer Paradigm for Enabling Internet Quality of Service. IEEE Communication Magazine, 114–121 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hacker, T.J., Noble, B.D., Athey, B.D.: Adaptive Data Block Scheduling for Parallel TCP Streams. In: IEEE HPDC 2005, pp. 265–275 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brendan, C., Traw, S., Smith, J.M.: Striping within the Network Subsystem. IEEE Network, 22–32 (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brakmo, L.S., Peterson, L.L.: TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet. IEEE JSAC 13, 1465–1480 (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keshav, S.: REAL: A network simulator, Department of Computer Science, UC Berkeley, Technical Report 88/472 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The ns-2 Network Simulator,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seung-Joon Seok
    • 1
  • Hyeong-Jun Kim
    • 2
  • Kwang-Min Jung
    • 3
  • Kyung-Hoe Kim
    • 4
  • Chul-Hee Kang
    • 4
  1. 1.Dep. of Computer EngineeringKyungnam UniversityMasan-siKorea
  2. 2.LG ElectronicsSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Samsung ElectronicsSuwon-siKorea
  4. 4.Dep. of Electronics and Computer EngineeringSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations