Advertisement

NetQi: A Model Checker for Anticipation Game

  • Elie Bursztein
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5311)

Abstract

NetQi is a freely available model-checker designed to analyze network incidents such as intrusion. This tool is an implementation of the anticipation game framework, a variant of timed game tailored for network analysis. The main purpose of NetQi is to find, given a network initial state and a set of rules, the best strategy that fulfills player objectives by model-checking the anticipation game and comparing the outcome of each play that fulfills strategy constraints. For instance, it can be used to find the best patching strategy. NetQi has been successfully used to analyze service failure due to hardware, network intrusion, worms and multiple-site intrusion defense cooperation.

Keywords

Player Action Security Expert Attack Graph Player Objective Strategy Objective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Behrmann, G., Cougnard, A., David, A., Fleury, E., Larsen, K.G., Lime, D.: Uppaal-tiga: Time for playing games! In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 121–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bursztein, E.: Netqi, http://www.netqi.org
  3. 3.
    Bursztein, E.: Network administrator and intruder strategies. Technical Report LSV-08-02, LSV, ENS Cachan (January 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bursztein, E., Goubault-Larrecq, J.: A logical framework for evaluating network resilience against faults and attacks. In: 12th annual Asian Computing Science Conference (ASIAN), December 2007, pp. 212–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Henzinger, T., Majumdar, R., Stoelinga, M.: The element of surprise in timed games. In: Amadio, R., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 144–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramakrishan, C., Sekar, R.: Model-based analysis of configuration vulnerabilities. Journal of Computer Security 1, 198–209 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ritchey, R.W., Ammann, P.: Using model checking to analyze network vulnerabilities. In: SP 2000: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 156–165. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheyner, O., Haines, J., Jha, S., Lippmann, R., Wing, J.M.: Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs. In: SP 2002: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 273–284. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elie Bursztein
    • 1
  1. 1.LSV, ENS Cachan, CNRS, INRIAFrance

Personalised recommendations