Skip to main content

Spatial Data Quality: Problems and Prospects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Trends in Geographic Information Science

Abstract

This paper reflects upon the topic of spatial data quality and the progress made in this field over the past 20-30 years. While international standards have been established, theoretical models of error developed, new visualization techniques introduced, and metadata now routinely documented for spatial datasets, difficulties nevertheless exist with the way data quality information is being described, communicated and applied in practice by users. These problems are identified and the paper suggests how the spatial information community might move forward to overcome these obstacles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agumya A, Hunter GJ (1999) A Risk-Based Approach to Assessing Fitness for Use of Geographical Information. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 11(1): 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedard Y (1987) Uncertainties in Land Information Systems Databases. In: Proceedings of the ACSM-ASPRS Auto Carto 8 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 175–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven K (2000) On Model Uncertainty, Risk and Decision Making. Hydrological Processes 14: 2605–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore M (1984) Generalization and Error in Spatial Databases. Cartographica 21(2): 131–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin AT, Hunter GJ (2007a) Facts or Fiction: Consumer Beliefs About Spatial Data Quality. In: Proceedings of the Spatial Science Institute Biennial International Conference (SSC 2007), Hobart, Tasmania, 14-18 May 2007, pp 721–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin AT, Hunter GJ (2007b) What communicates quality to the spatial data consumer? In: Stein A (ed) Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality (ISSDQ 2007), Enschede, The Netherlands, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassel K, Bucher F, Stephan E-M, Vckovski A (1995) Completeness. In: Guptill SC, Morrison JL (eds) Elements of Spatial Data Quality, International Cartographic Association (ICA) Commission on Spatial Data Quality, Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 81–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1986) Principles of Geographic Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1991) The Development of Intelligent Geographical Information Systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on GIS (EGIS ’91), Brussels, Belgium, vol. 1, pp 165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, Frank AU (eds) (1996) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, London, Taylor & Francis, 345 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (1998) European Prestandard ENV 12656: Geographic Information - Data Description - Quality, dated October 1998, CEN Secretariat, Brussels, 46 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman NR (1984) The Role of Quality Information in the Long-term Functioning of a Geographic Information System. Cartographica 21(2 & 3): 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman NR (1991) The Error Component in Spatial Data. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical Information Systems: Principles & Applications, Longman, London, vol. 1, pp. 165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosetto M, Tarantola S (2001) Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis: Tools for GIS-based Model Implementation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS) 15(5): 415–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin S, Bregt AK, Van de Ven M (2001) Assessing Fitness for Use: the Expected Value of Spatial Data sets. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS) 15(5): 457–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devillers R, Bedard Y, Jeansoulin R, Moulin B (2007) Towards Spatial Data Quality Information Analysis Tools for Experts Assessing the Fitness for Use of Spatial Data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS) 21(3): 261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette M, Paresi C (2000) Quality Management in GDI. In: Groot R, McLaughlin J (eds) Geospatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts, Cases and Good Practice, Oxford, London, pp 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckham M, McCreadie J (1999) An Intelligent, Distributed Error-Aware OOGIS. In: Shi W, Goodchild MF, Fisher PF (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, pp 496–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (1997) IDRISI for Windows: User’s Guide Version 2.0. Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Glasgow J, Gunther O, Herring J, Puequet DJ (1999) Progress in Computational Methods for Representing Geographical Concepts. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS) 13(8): 775–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein EF, Roitman H (1987) Liability for Information. In: Proceedings of the URISA 1987 Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, vol. 4, pp 115–25

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2000) Using ArcCatalog. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoscience Australia (2006) Geodata TOPO 250 K Series 3 User Guide. Geoscience Australia website, http://www.ga.gov.au/nmd/products/digidat/250 k.htm, accessed 1 January 2009

  • Getis A (2000) Spatial Analysis and GIS: An Introduction. Journal of Geographical Systems 2: 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (1978) Statistical Aspects of the Polygon Overlay Problem. In: Dutton G (ed) Proceedings of the First International Advanced Study Symposium on Topological Data Structures for Geographic Information Systems, Harvard University, Massachussetts, Vol. 6, 22 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (1992) Research Initiative 1: Accuracy of Spatial Databases - Closing Report. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA), University of California, Santa Barbara, 19 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (1993) Data Models and Data Quality: Problems and Prospects. In: Goodchild MF, Parks BO, Steyaert LT (eds) Environmental Modeling with GIS, Oxford, New York, pp 94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2000) The Current Status of GIS and Spatial Analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems: 2, pp 5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guptill SC, Morrison JL (eds) (1995) Elements of Spatial Data Quality, International Cartographic Association (ICA) Commission on Spatial Data Quality, Elsevier Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink GBM, Burrough PA, Stein A (1989) Propagation of Errors in Spatial Modeling in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems (IJGIS) 3(4): 302–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson BD (1990) Concepts of Soil Mapping and Interpretation. Soil Survey Horizons 31(3): 63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 19113 (2002) Geographic Information-Quality Principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 19114 (2003) Geographic information-Quality evaluation procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 19115 (2003) Geographic Information-Metadata. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter GJ, Qiu J, Goodchild MF (1999) Application of a New Model of Vector Data Uncertainty. In: Lowell K (ed) Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Resources, Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, pp 201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall EB (1975) The Accuracy of Map Overlays. Landscape Planning 2: 25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marble DF (2000) Some Thoughts on the Integration of Spatial Analysis and Geographic Information Systems. Journal of Geographical Systems 2: 31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota Planning (1999) Positional Accuracy Handbook, Minnesota Planning: Land Management Information Centre, http://www.mnplan.state.mn.us/press/accurate.html, accessed 12 November 2001

  • Moellering H (ed) (1991) Spatial Database Transfer Standards: Current International Status, Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NCDCDS (1986) Working Group II on Data Set Quality: Testing the Interim Proposed Standard for Digital Cartographic Data Quality. In: Moellering H (ed) Issues in Digital Cartographic Data Standards, Report #7, U.S. National Committee for Digital Cartographic Data Standards (NCDCDS), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) (1992) Spatial Data Transfer Standard. Federal Information Processing Standard 173, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1989) Learning to live with Errors in Spatial Databases. In: Goodchild MF, Gopal S (eds) Accuracy of Spatial Databases, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 263–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordnance Survey (2009) OS MasterMap Topography Layer. Ordnance Survey website, www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/products/osmastermap/layers/topography/index.html, accessed 1 January 2009

  • Qiu J, Hunter GJ (2002) A GIS with the Capacity for Managing Data Quality Information. In: Goodchild MF, Fisher PF, Shi W (eds) Spatial Data Quality, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 230–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Peuquet DJ (2001) Making Space for Time: Issues in Space-Time Data Representation. GeoInformatica 5(1): 11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson VB, Frank AU (1985) About Different Kinds of Uncertainty in Collections of Spatial Data. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography (Auto Carto 7), Washington, D.C., pp 440–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq Z, Duckham MD (2009) Integrated Storage and Querying of Spatially Varying Data Quality Information in a Relational Spatial Database. Transactions in GIS 13(1): 30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oort P, Bregt AK (2005) Do Users Ignore Spatial Data Quality? A decision-Theoretic Perspective. Risk Analysis 25(6): 1599–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary J. Hunter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunter, G.J., Bregt, A.K., Heuvelink, G.B., De Bruin, S., Virrantaus, K. (2009). Spatial Data Quality: Problems and Prospects. In: Navratil, G. (eds) Research Trends in Geographic Information Science. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88244-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics