Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC))

  • 981 Accesses

Abstract

“Why use computers for arts?” “What are the advantages of digital arts?” These questions seem to assume computers are already applicable to arts. But is the computer by its very nature a kind of art creation tool? Only if this answer is affirmative can we go on to discuss what sorts of artistic results would the computer be able to generate and the advantages. It turns out that for many practicing artists, a large part of their artistic talent or training is about how to make use of literally anything on earth that happens to fall into their grip to do art creation. Of course, the computer is included. But an artistic genius could still produce wonderful artwork even when the tool is inferior. So the real question is whether the computer is really a good or suitable tool for art creation for all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Jacob T. Biehl, Piotr D. Adamczyk, and Brian P. Bailey. Djogger: a mobile dynamic music device. In CHI’ 06: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Quebec, Canada: ACM Press, pages 556–561, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Christoph Bregler, Lorie Loeb, Erika Chuang, and Hrishi Deshpande. Turning to the masters: motion capturing cartoons. In SIGGRAPH’ 02: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, San Antonio, TX, USA: ACM Press, pages 399–407, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Bernard, Chia Hui Liao, and Melissa Mills. The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. In CHI’ 01: CHI’ 01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA, USA: ACM Press, pages 175–176, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dan Boyarski, Christine Neuwirth, Jodi Forlizzi, and Susan H. Regli. A study of fonts designed for screen display. In CHI’ 98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 87–94, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jared Benson, Ken Olewiler, and Nancy Broden. Typography for mobile phone devices: the design of the qualcomm sans font family. In DUX’ 05: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Designing for User Experience, San Francisco, CA, USA: American Institute of Graphic Arts, page 58, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. [CBK+06]_Cristobal Curio, Martin Breidt, Mario Kleiner, Quoc C. Vuong, Martin A. Giese, and Heinrich H. Bülthoff. Semantic 3D motion retargeting for facial animation. In APGV’ 06: Proceedings of the 3rd. Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, Boston, MA, USA: ACM Press, pages 77–84, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dan Collins. The challenge of digital sculpture: or how to become better tool users. In Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Symposium on Art and Technology, Connecticut College. Available as http://www.asu.edu/cfa/art/people/faculty/collins/digital_sculpt. html, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David H. Cope. Virtual Music: Computer Synthesis of Musical Style. The MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charles Dodge and Thomas A. Jerse. Computer Music: Synthesis, Composition, and Performance. Schirmer, 2nd, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jun Dong. Introduction to Computer Calligraphy (In Chinese). Beijing, China: Science Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fredo Durand. An invitation to discuss computer depiction. In NPAR’ 02: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and Rendering, Annecy, France: ACM Press, pages 111–124, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. David R. Fuchs and Donald E. Knuth. Optimal prepaging and font caching. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(1):62–79, 1985.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Michael Gleicher. Motion editing with spacetime constraints. In SI3D’ 97: Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Providence, RI, USA: ACM Press, pages 139–148, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Gleicher. Retargetting motion to new characters. In SIGGRAPH’ 98: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, USA: ACM Press, pages 33–42, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Ephraim P. Glinert. A large font virtual terminal interface: a software prosthesis for the visually impaired. Commun. ACM, 27(6):567–572, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roger D. Hersch and Claude Betrisey. Model-based matching and hinting of fonts. In SIGGRAPH’ 91: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press, pages 71–80, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. John E. Howland. A system for compiling fonts. In APL’ 87: Proceedings of the International Conference on APL, Dallas, TX, USA: ACM Press, pages 349–355, 1987.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Horace H. S. Ip, Young Hay, and Alex C. C. Tang. Body-brush: a body-driven interface for visual aesthetics. In MULTIMEDIA’ 02: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Juan-les-pins, France: ACM Press, pages 664–665, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Donald E. Knuth. Tex and. Metafont: New Directions in Typesetting. American Mathematical Society; Bedford, MA, USA: Digital Press; Providence, RI, USA: ACM Press, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Joshua Larrabee. Dear notebook: font memoirs. Interactions, 13(4):10–13, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ka-Wah Lo, Ka-Wai Kwok, Sheung-Man Wong, and Yeung Yam. Brush footprint acquisition and preliminary analysis for Chinese calligraphy using a robot drawing platform. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China: IEEE Computer Society, pages 5183–5188, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Jehee Lee and Sung Yong Shin. A hierarchical approach to interactive motion editing for human-like figures. In SIGGRAPH’ 99: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and, Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 39–48, 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Jonathan Ling and Paul Van Schaik. The influence of font type and line length on visual search and information retrieval in web pages. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(5):395–404, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peter Manning. Electronic and Computer Music. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mark Nelson. Getting Started in Computer Music. Thomson Course Technology, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yuta Okabe, Suguru Saito, and Masayuki Nakajima. Paintbrush rendering of lines using hms. In GRAPHITE’ 05: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, Dunedin, New Zealand: ACM Press, pages 91–98, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Keith Packard. The xft font library: architecture and users guide. In ALS’ 01: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Linux Showcase and Conference, Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association, pages 22–22, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joseph A. Paradiso and Eric Hu. Expressive footwear for computer-augmented dance performance. In ISWC’ 97: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Cambridge, MA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, page 165, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Joseph A. Paradiso, Kai Yuh Hsiao, and Ari Benbasat. Interfacing to the foot: apparatus and applications. In CHI’ 00: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Netherlands: ACM Press, pages 175–176, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frederic Pighin and J. P. Lewis. Facial motion retargeting. In SIGGRAPH’ 06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses, Boston, MA, USA: ACM Press, page 2, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Sang II Park, Hyun Joon Shin, and Sung Yong Shin. On-line locomotion generation based on motion blending. In SCA’ 02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, San Antonio, TX, USA: ACM Press, pages 105–111, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Charles Rose, Brian Cuenter, Bobby Bodenheimer, and Michael F. Cohen. Efficient generation of motion transitions using spacetime constraints. In SIGGRAPH’ 96: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM Press, pages 147–154, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Curtis Roads. The Music Machine: Selected. Readings from Computer Music Journal. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Curtis Roads. The Computer Music Tutorial. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hyun-Joon Shin, Jehee Lee, Sung-Yong Shin, and Michael Gleicher. Computer puppetry: an importance-based approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 20(2):67–94, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. David J. Sturman. Computer puppetry. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18(1):38–45, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. J. Summers. A computer-aided system (CAS) for the design, manufacture, test, and documentation of digital printed circuit boards. In DAG’ 74: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Design Automation, Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pages 273–278, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sivan Toledo and Lars Knoll. Font subsetting and downloading in the postscript printer driver of qt/x11. In ALS’ 01: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Linux Showcase and Conference, Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association, pages 23–23, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Seyoon Tak and Hyeong-Seok Ko. A physically-based motion retargeting filter. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 24(1):98–117, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mikko Tervonen, Hannu Lehikoinen, and Timo Mukari. Integrated computer-aided design, documentation and manufacturing system for PCD electronics. In DAG’ 83: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Design Automation, Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pages 436–443, 1983.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Stefan Thiemert, Martin Steinebach, and Patrick Wolf. A digital watermark for vector-based fonts. In MM&Sec ’06: Proceeding of the 8th Workshop on Multimedia and Security, Geneva, Switzerland: ACM Press, pages 120–123, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Shenzheng Wang, Hsijian Lee. Dual-binarization and anisotropic diffusion of Chinese characters in calligraphy documents. In ICDAR’ 01: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Washington, D.C., USA: IEEE Computer Society, pages 271–275, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Sam T.S. Wong, Howard Leung, and Horace H.S. Ip. Model-based analysis of Chinese calligraphy images. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, UK: IEEE Computer Society, pages 221–226, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Toshinori Yamasaki and Tetsuo Hattori. Computer calligraphy-brush written kanji formation based on the brush-touch movement. In IEEE International Conference on Systems. Man, and, Cybernetics, Vancouver, Canada: IEEE Computer Society, pages 1736–1741, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jinhui Yu and Qunsheng Peng. Realistic synthesis of Cao Shu of Chinese calligraphy. Computers and Graphics, 29(1):145–153, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Douglas E. Zongker, Geraldine Wade, and David H. Salesin. Example-based hinting of true type fonts. In SIGGRAPH’ 00: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 411–416, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou and Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Computer Science and Fine Arts. In: A Computational Approach to Digital Chinese Painting and Calligraphy. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88148-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88148-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88147-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88148-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics