Advertisement

A Qualitative Study of the Applicability of Technology Acceptance Models to Senior Mobile Phone Users

  • Judy van Biljon
  • Karen Renaud
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5232)

Abstract

This paper investigates the factors that influence mobile phone adoption by the older user. Technology adoption is a process, with the adopter progressing from a state of ignorance of the technology to embracing it and considering it a necessity. Full progression can only occur if the adopter fully accepts the technology. If not, he or she is unlikely to progress towards wholehearted adoption and remain a reluctant user or discard the technology altogether. Many theoretical models explain the dynamics of technology acceptance by proposing particular predictive factors and are based on quantitative studies built on the responses of students or economically active adults. This begs the question: Do existing technology acceptance models incorporate the factors that lead to mobile phone adoption and use by older adults? We consulted findings from studies of senior mobile phone users and extracted a number of issues concerning needs, uses and limitations, which we verified by means of structured interviews with senior mobile phone users. We compare these qualitatively derived issues with the factors from existing quantitative models. This led to the identification of a two-dimensional adoption matrix where verified acceptance factors, derived from the experiences and opinions of our participants, are mapped against a recognised adoption process, highlighting the fact that current models only partly predict adoption and acceptance by the senior mobile phone user.

Keywords

Mobile technology acceptance usability elderly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mallenius, S., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K.: Factors affecting the adoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people – results from a pilot study. In: 6th Annual Global Mobility Roundtable 2007, Los Angeles (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, Y.S.: Older adults’ user experiences with mobile phones: Identification of user clusters and user requirements, in Industrial and Systems Engineering. Doctoral dissertation at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Biljon, J.A.: A Model for Representing the Motivational and Cultural Factors that Influence Mobile Phone Usage Variety, Doctoral dissertation at the School of Computing. University of South Africa, Pretoria (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haddon, L.: Domestication and Mobile Telephony, In Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology, pp. 43–56. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ling, R.: The diffusion of mobile telephony among Norwegian teens: A report from after the revolution. Telenor Research and Development (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverstone, R., Haddon, L.: Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life. In: Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford, pp. 44–74 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D.F.: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 1. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pedersen, E.: Adoption of Mobile Internet Services: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Commerce Early Adopters. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 15(3), 203–222 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon, H.S., Chidambaram, L.: A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarker, S., Wells, J.D.: Understanding Mobile Handheld Device use and adoption. Communications of the ACM 46(12), 35–40 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phillips, L., Sternthal, B.: Age differences in information processing: a perspective on the aged consumer. Journal of Marketing Research 14(2), 444–457 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abascal, J., Civit, A.: Universal Access to Mobile Telephony as a way to enhance the Autonomy of Elderly People. In: WUAUC 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ziefle, M., Bay, S.: Mental Models of a Cellular Phone Menu. In: Brewster, S.A., Dunlop, M.D. (eds.) Mobile HCI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3160, pp. 25–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Osman, Z., Maguir, M., Tarkiainen, M.: Older Users’ Requirements for Location Based Services and Mobile Phones. In: Chittaro, L. (ed.) Mobile HCI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2795, pp. 352–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurniawan, A.: Mobile Phone Design for Older Persons, Interactions, pp. 24–25 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chismar, W.G., Wiley-Patton, S.: Does the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Apply to Physicians. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2003), doi:10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174354Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judy van Biljon
    • 1
  • Karen Renaud
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of South AfricaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations