Towards Obtaining Analysis-Level Class and Use Case Diagrams from Business Process Models

  • Alfonso Rodríguez
  • Eduardo Fernández-Medina
  • Mario Piattini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5232)


Nowadays, business process modeling, using industrial standards such as UML or BPMN, offers us a good opportunity to incorporate requirements at high levels of abstraction. In the context of Model Driven Architecture (MDA), the business process model is considered as a Computation Independent Model (CIM). In our proposal we will transform the business process specifications into analysis-level classes and use cases, both of which are UML artifacts used to describe the problem in the context of Platform Independent Models (PIM). Such artifacts are complementary, as they are only a subset of the analysis-level classes and use cases that describe the whole problem, in the first stages of the software development process. This work contains the principle issues involved in the main standards that allow us to represent a business process, details of the transformation rules in QVT specification and an illustrative example in which our proposal has been applied.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aguilar-Savén, R.S.: Business process modelling: Review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics 90(2), 129–149 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artelsmair, C., Wagner, R.: Towards a Security Engineering Process. In: The 7th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol. VI, pp. 22–27 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barros, J.P., Gomes, L.: From Activity Diagrams to Class Diagrams. In: Workshop Dynamic Behaviour in UML Models: Semantic Questions In conjunction with Third International Conference on UML (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bézivin, J.: In Search of a Basic Principle for Model Driven Engineering. UPGRADE, European Journal for the Informatics Professional V (2), 21–24 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bider, I.: Choosing Approach to Business Process Modeling - Practical Perspective,
  6. 6.
    BPMN: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) 04.pdf (2020),
  7. 7.
    Castela, N., Tribolet, J., Silva, A., Guerra, A.: Business Process Modeling with UML. In: 3rd. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 2, pp. 679–685 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dijkman, R.M., Joosten, S.M.M.: An Algorithm to Derive Use Cases from Business Processes. In: 6th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (SEA), pp. 679–684 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eriksson, H.-E., Penker, M.: Business Modeling with UML. OMG Press (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giaglis, G.M.: A Taxonomy of Business Process Modelling and Information Systems Modelling Techniques. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 13(2), 209–228 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jouault, F., Kurtev, I.: On the architectural alignment of ATL and QVT. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing - Model Transformation, pp. 1188–1195 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalnins, A., Barzdins, J., Celms, E.: UML Business Modeling Profile. In: Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems Development, Advances in Theory, Practice and Education, pp. 182–194 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liew, P., Kontogiannis, P., Tong, T.: A Framework for Business Model Driven Development. In: 12th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP), pp. 47–56 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lonjon, A.: Business Process Modeling and Standardization (2004),
  16. 16.
    Object Management Group: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1,
  17. 17.
    OMG: Object Management Group,
  18. 18.
    QVT: Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification. OMG Adopted Specification ptc/05-11-01 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rungworawut, W., Senivongse, T.: A Guideline to Mapping Business Processes to UML Class Diagrams. WSEAS Trans. on Computers 4(11), 1526–1533 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rungworawut, W., Senivongse, T.: Using Ontology Search in the Design of Class Diagram from Business Process Model. Enformatika, Transactions on Engineering, Computing and Technology 12, 165–170 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Štolfa, S., Vondrák, I.: A Description of Business Process Modeling as a Tool for Definition of Requirements Specification. In: Systems Integration 12th Annual International Conference, pp. 463–469 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    White, S.A.: Process Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfonso Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Eduardo Fernández-Medina
    • 2
  • Mario Piattini
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science and Information Technology DepartmentUniversity of Bio-BioChillánChile
  2. 2.ALARCOS Research Group, Information Systems and Technologies Department, UCLM-Indra Research and Development InstituteUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations