Automating the Processes of Selecting an Appropriate Scheduling Algorithm and Configuring the Scheduler Implementation for Time-Triggered Embedded Systems

  • Ayman K. Gendy
  • Michael J. Pont
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5219)


Predictable system behaviour is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition when creating safety-critical and safety-related embedded systems. At the heart of such systems there is usually a form of scheduler: the use of time-triggered schedulers is of particular concern in this paper. It has been demonstrated in previous studies that the problem of determining the task parameters for such a scheduler is NP-hard. We have previously described an algorithm (“TTSA1”) which is intended to address this problem. This paper describes an extended version of this algorithm (“TTSA2”) which employs task segmentation to increase schedulability. We show that the TTSA2 algorithm is highly efficient when compared with alternative “branch and bound” search schemes.


Safety-related embedded systems automatic code generation scheduler time triggered 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Domaratsky, Y., Perevozchikov, M.: Highly dependable time-triggered operating system-static scheduling approach and effective run-time implementations, Dedicated Systems Magazine, pp. 77–84 (October-December 2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kopetz, H.: Real-Time Systems, Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pont, M.J.: Patterns For Time-Triggered Embedded Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scheler, F., Schröder-Preikschat, W.: Time-Triggered vs. Event-Triggered: A matter of configuration? In: Dulz, W., Schröder-Preikschat, W. (eds.) MMB Workshop Proceedings (GI/ITG Workshop on Non-Functional Properties of Embedded Systems Nuremberg, pp. 107–112. VDE Verlag, Berlin (2006) ISBN 978-3-8007-2956-2Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albert, A.: Comparison of Event-Triggered and Time-Triggered Concepts with Regard to Distributed Control Systems, Embedded World 2004, Nuremberg, WEKA Verlag, pp. 235–252 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, J.: Making Software Timing Properties Easier to Inspect and Verify. IEEE Software 20(4), 34–41 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, J., Parnas, D.L.: Priority Scheduling Versus Pre-Run-Time Scheduling. Int. Journal of Time-Critical Systems 18, 7–23 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker, T.P., Shaw, A.: The Cyclic Executive Model and Ada. Real-Time Systems 1(1), 7–25 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tindell, K., Burns, A., Wellings, A.: Allocating Hard Real-Time Tasks: An NP-Hard Problem Made Easy. Real-Time Systems 4(2), 145–165 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baruah, S.K.: The Non-Preemptive Scheduling of Periodic Tasks Upon Multiprocessors. Real-Time Systems 32(1-2), 9–20 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gendy, A.K., Pont, M.J.: Automatically Configuring Time-Triggered Schedulers for Use with Resource-Constrained, Single-Processor Embedded Systems. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics 4(1), 37–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gangoiti, U., Marcos, M., Estévez, E.: Using Cyclic Executives for Achieving Closed Loop Co-Simulation. In: Proc. of the Joint 44th IEEE Control and Decision Conference and European Control Conference CDC-ECC 2005, Sevilla, pp. 3790 –4785 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buttazzo, G.C.: Rate monotonic vs. EDF: Judgement day. Real-Time Systems 29(1), 5–26 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, C., Chang, L., Kuo, T.: A Cyclic-Executive-Based QoS Guarantee over USB. In: IEEE 9th Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, Toronto, Canada, May 27-30, 2003, pp. 88–95 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burns, A.: Generating Feasible Cyclic Schedules. Control Engineering Practice 3(2), 151–162 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Locke, C.D.: Software Architecture for Hard Real-Time Applications: Cyclic Executives Vs. Fixed Priority Executives. Real-Time Systems 4(1), 37–52 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Phatrapornnant, T., Pont, M.J.: Reducing Jitter in Embedded Systems Employing A Time-Triggered Software Architecture and Dynamic Voltage Scaling. IEEE Transactions on Computers (Special Issue on Design and Test of Systems-On-a-Chip) 55(2), 113–124 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allworth, S.T.: An Introduction to Real-Time Software Design. Macmillan, London (1981)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maaita, A., Pont, M.J.: Using Planned Pre-Emption to Reduce Levels ff Task Jitter in a Time-Triggered Hybrid Scheduler, UK Embedded Forum, Birmingham, UK, University of Newcastle (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kalinsky, D.: Context Switch. Embedded Systems Programming 14(1), 94–105 (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schlindwein, F.S., Smith, M.J., Evans, D.H.: Spectral Analysis of Doppler Signals and Computation of the Normalized First Moment in Real Time. Using a Digital Signal Processor, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 26, 228–232 (1988)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, C.L., Layland, J.W.: Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard Real-Time Environment. Journal of the ACM 20(1), 40–61 (1973)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gendy, A.K., Pont, M.J.: Towards a Generic Single-Path Programming Solution with Reduced Power Consumption. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2007), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, September 4-7 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Puschner, P., Burns, A.: Writing Temporally Predictable Code. In: Proc. 7th IEEE International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, pp. 85–91 (January 2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puschner, P.: The Single-Path Approach Towards WCET-Analysable Software. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pp. 699–704 (December 2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cucu, L., Sorel, Y.: Non-Preemptive Multiprocessor Scheduling for Strict Periodic Systems with Precedence Constraints. In: Proc. 23rd Annual Workshop of the UK Planning and Scheduling Special Interest Group, PLANSIG 2004, Cork, Ireland (December 2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buttazzo, G.: Hard Real-Time Computing Systems: Predictable Scheduling Algorithms and Applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu, J., Parnas, D.L.: Scheduling Processes with Release Times, Deadlines, Precedence and Exclusion Relations. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(3), 360–369 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sandström, K., Norström, C.: Managing Complex Temporal Requirements in Real-Time Control Systems. In: 9th IEEE Conf. Engineering of Computer-Based Systems. IEEE, Sweden (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ekelin, C., Jonsson, J.: Evaluation of Search Heuristics for Embedded System Scheduling Problems. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, Paphos, Cyprus, pp. 640–654 (2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reeves, G.: What Really Happened on Mars?, – Authoritative Account (1997),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayman K. Gendy
    • 1
  • Michael J. Pont
    • 1
  1. 1.Embedded Systems LaboratoryUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations