Resilience in the Aviation System

  • Antonio Chialastri
  • Simone Pozzi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5219)


This paper presents an overview of the main characteristics of the civil aviation domain and their relation with concepts coming from the approach of resilience engineering. Our objective is to first outline the structural properties of the aviation domain (i.e. regulations, standards, relationships among the various actors, system dynamics), to then present some example processes that bear an effect on the system resilience. We will in particular reason on training and on the role of automation, to discuss how and to what extent they impact on system resilience. We contend that, in a complex system like aviation, resilience engineering is not a matter of simple technical upgrades, rather is about facing contradictory tensions and dynamic system changes. This paper contains a pilot’s first-hand reflections, so it aims to stimulate discussion on some issues that are still open, rather than providing solutions.


International Civil Aviation Organization System Resilience Flight Management Resilience Engineering Aviation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Leveson, N.G.: A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems. Safety Science 42(4), 237–270 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N.: Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Burlington (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hollnagel, E.: Resilience-The challenge of the unstable. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amalberti, R.: The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science 37(2-3), 109–126 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reason, J.T.: Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reason, J.T.: Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leveson, N.G.: Safeware. System safety and computers. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dekker, S.: The re-invention of human error. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 1(3), 247–265 (2001)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dekker, S.: Ten Questions About Human Error: A New View Of Human Factors And System Safety. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dekker, S.: Why we need new accident models. Journal of Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 2 4(1), 1–18 (in press, 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sindall, T.: Special Objectives Check on air Operator’s Fuel Planning Policies. FOCUS on Commercial Aviation Safety 42 (summer, 2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Chialastri
    • 1
  • Simone Pozzi
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Aviation LabRomeItaly
  2. 2.Deep Blue srlRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Psychology of Social and Developmental ProcessesSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations